Here is how the Peak Oil War of Words between Dave McGowan and Michael Ruppert began. In Dave's funny but insightful rant in his January 30, 2004 NEWSLETTER #49 he was commenting on some of the current "myths that seem to have taken root in the 'progressive' community." Bear with the myths that lead up to peak oil, I think it's worthwhile to get the drift of his thinking and writing by looking at the full list:
Myth #1: A "neocon" cabal has hijacked the Bush administration's foreign policy, setting America on a new and dangerous course.
I should first mention here that, although it may have escaped many readers' attention, the word "neocon" has never before appeared in one of these newsletters. That is because I like to, as much as possible, focus on things that actually exist. And that is also because I haven't felt the need to find some elaborate way of explaining the alleged change in U.S. foreign policy, primarily because I haven't been able to detect a noticeable change in U.S. foreign policy. The change that others perceive is based on several more myths, beginning with:
Myth #2: Team Bush set a dangerous new precedent by introducing the notion of 'preemptive' wars.
And that is, I guess, in stark contrast to our past military ventures, which have been, I suppose, purely defensive actions (self-defense being the only legally defensible reason for undertaking military actions against another sovereign state) -- like when we defended ourselves against Serbia. And Bosnia. And Somalia. And Panama. And Grenada. And Vietnam. And Laos. And Cambodia. And all the other countries that apparently attacked us first, or at least seriously threatened to, although I can't, off the top of my head, recall the specific attacks that we were responding to in any of those cases.
To be sure, under Team Bush we were fed lies to garner our support for two (yes, two) unprovoked, illegal, unjustified wars. But what exactly is new about that?
Myth #3: Team Bush's disdain for international treaties and agreements is unprecedented.
Not by any objective standard, although it may seem that way to those who until very recently viewed America as some great and benevolent force in the world. Wake up and smell the coffee, folks: the U.S. did not suddenly abandon its previous role as international do-gooder and become an international menace overnight. The record is very clear: America has been, for a very long time, the single greatest impediment to the establishment of international human rights standards, international arms control agreements, and an International Criminal Court. Consider the following excerpts from Amnesty International's landmark 1998 report, "United States of America - Rights for All":
-
"There are only two countries in the world that have not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child. One is the collapsed state of Somalia which has no recognized government - the other is the USA."
-
"(T)he USA is also one of only a handful of countries that have not ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women."
-
"The first UN human rights treaty ratified by the USA was the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. It ratified the Convention in 1988, 40 years after signing it and after 97 other states had already ratified it."
-
"The USA took 28 years to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, after 133 other states had already ratified it."
-
"At least 71 other states ratified the Convention against Torture before the USA."
-
"It was only in 1992, after 109 other states, that the USA ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 26 years after its adoption by the UN General Assembly."
-
"The ICCPR is one of two principal treaties protecting human rights as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The other - the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - has still not been ratified by the USA."
-
"(T)he USA has refused to recognize any regional human rights treaties: it has not ratified the American Convention on Human Rights, adopted by the OAS (Organization of American States) in 1969, and has not even signed the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons and the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women."
And that is but the tip of the proverbial iceberg. George Bush's 'liberal' predecessor did nothing to rectify any of those, uhmm, 'oversights.' He also presided over the rejection of a major international arms agreement and openly flaunted an international ban on the use of landmines by introducing a new $50,000,000 landmine program not long before said ban was to go into effect.
Myth #4: The "neocons" have taken a new, hardline stance in support of Israeli aggression. By some accounts, Israel now dictates U.S. foreign policy, through Jewish "neocons" like Wolfowitz and Perle.
The truth is that the United States has always taken a hardline, pro-Israel stance, and has always looked the other way while Israel commits egregious human rights violations in the occupied territories. In fact, the U.S. has made a habit of being the only nation to consistently side with Israel and defend its actions in the face of worldwide opposition. In 1981 alone, many years before the 'neocons' took the reins, the U.S. was Israel's sole defender during UN voting on 11 different resolutions. As many as 141 countries voted against the U.S./Israeli positions.
And so, once again, we see that what has been portrayed as a radical change in course is, in truth, the perpetuation of an historical pattern. America has always armed, protected and quietly supported Israel -- which is essentially an enormous, nuclear-armed, Western military outpost in the Middle East. Israel, to put it bluntly, is a tool of the West, not the other way around.
"But wait," you say, "isn't America fighting Israel's war in the Middle East?" No. America is fighting for the same thing America always fights for: the advancement of American corporate interests. Those interests happen to be shared by the corporate/political elite of Israel.
Myth #5: The policies of Team Bush have antagonized and alienated many of our closest allies, straining relationships with many previously friendly nations.
It would be far more accurate to say that the brazen criminality of the Bush team, as opposed to the more covert criminality of preceding administrations, has forced other world leaders to occasionally distance themselves from the U.S., lest they incur the wrath of the people. But said leaders will always be quick to kiss and make-up if provided with the slightest hint of political cover (such as the capture of Saddam Hussein).
As I have said before, I do not believe that the heads-of-state of other 'Western' nations have many significant differences with their American counterparts with regards to motive or agenda. The difference is one of strategy, due to the fact that a population with knowledge of history and a reasonably accurate view of current events forces a certain amount of restraint upon the actions of national leaders. U.S. leaders, on the other hand, can operate virtually without restraint.
In other words, while Bush has certainly done a fine job of provoking legitimate outrage among the world's people, he has only provoked staged outrage among the leaders of the 'Western world.' Indeed, behind the scenes there could well be much admiration for an administration so transparent in its motives, and so brazen in its lies, and yet so successful at maintaining legitimacy.
Myth #6: The European Union is going to rise up as some kind of counter-force to the U.S. military machine.
Sorry, but I just don't see that happening. The EU is fully complicit in the drive for global fascism, and all of Europe will ultimately adopt the police-state blueprint being drafted in America, albeit on a somewhat different timetable. There will be no meaningful foreign opposition, and there will be no place to run and hide.
Myth #7: The current war in Iraq was drafted in 1998 by the "neocon" cabal operating as the "Project for a New American Century."
By 1998, the war against Iraq had already been underway for many years, following a script that was obviously written before the first George Bush began military operations by pummeling Iraq from the air. That was, for the memory impaired, followed by years of crippling sanctions and the enforcement of illegal 'no-fly zones' that were created specifically to provide a pretext for intermittent bombings that continued for well over a decade.
None of that was intended to 'contain' Saddam Hussein, or to force his compliance with cynical UN resolutions; the goal was always to weaken the nation's defenses and demoralize the civilian population as preparation for a military occupation that was in the cards long before "Little George and the Neocons" came to town.
Myth #8: The real reason for the war in Iraq is concern over "Peak Oil."
The notion of "Peak Oil" seems to have been carefully seeded throughout the 'progressive' community, most prominently by Michael Ruppert, but by many others as well. Personally, I ain't buying it. It positively reeks of bullshit. What the "Peak Oil" promoters are essentially saying is: "I am outraged by the fact that Team Bush has waged a war of aggression motivated solely by the pursuit of oil ... but (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) it's a damn good thing that they did, because the world is quickly running out of oil and if we don't grab it now, we're going to be in big trouble, and soon."
Now don't get me wrong -- I really want the "Peak Oil" thing to be true. I can't really think of a better scenario, at this point, than the world running out of oil. The entire global fascist system (or GFS for short, which is kind of like the NWO, only different, since the NWO is usually pitched as some sort of global communist/socialist system), you see, runs on oil. The military machine can't operate without it. The global corporate infrastructure can't run without it. It is the life-blood of global capitalism. So there would be a certain poetic justice if those who had toiled so long to achieve their dream of world domination were to suddenly find themselves - on the eve of declaring game, set and match - unable to operate the empire they had created. We would then be forced, alas, to start over -- to rebuild and restructure.
It would be nice if that were true. It would save the American people, and the world's people, a lot of work. But I don't see it happening. And, yes, I am aware that 'experts,' with far more knowledge in the field than I, have warned of "Peak Oil." But I am also aware that if the right people consult with the right 'experts,' those 'experts' will say pretty much anything they are asked to say.
Myth #9: The (fill in the blank) scandal is going to bring down the House of Bush, or key members within it.
Some writers seem to have an obsession with predicting the imminent demise of Team Bush (I'm thinking here again, for some reason, of Michael Ruppert), as one scandal or another supposedly threatens to overtake the, uhmm, "neocons" -- as though the dissemination of deliberately leaked 'limited hangouts,' and other damage control measures, somehow indicates that the media has suddenly decided to do its job.
The Plame scandal was, according to many, the one that was going to bring Team Bush down. It gave a lot of lefties a chance to express outrage over the outing of a CIA asset, and to absurdly claim that such an outing threatens our national security, when all that is really threatened is both the success of various covert operations aimed at expanding the Western empire, and the well-being of the assets involved in those operations.
Personally, I would like to see Team Bush expand on this new policy. In fact, I think the names of all CIA assets around the world should be published. Let the chips fall where they may. I'm guessing that more than a few outed assets would be shipped home in roughly the same condition as Charles Dean. I'm not suggesting here, mind you, that Charles was, you know, a CIA asset or anything like that, even though his ultra-conservative family has long been deeply connected. Charles just happened to be backpacking around Laos at the time that a genocidal war was being covertly waged there. I'm sure that a lot of pleasure-seekers were backpacking around Laos at the time. And I'm also sure that little brother Howard, being the 'liberal,' 'anti-war' candidate that he is, never had any affiliation with the CIA. No, he has turned his back on his family's money and politics -- not unlike, I suppose, that Osama bin Laden guy. But here I digress ...
Myth #10: Team Bush's militarism and domestic repression is driven by a 'crisis' of global capitalism.
This school of thought holds that Team Bush's resort to more overtly fascist rule is a desperate attempt to keep a failed system propped up. In essence, this is yet another attempt to explain what is portrayed as a significant break in the continuum of U.S. foreign and domestic policy. But here again I must ask: what has really changed?
With a 'liberal,' pre-9/11 administration in place, we launched unprovoked cruise missile strikes on two sovereign nations (Sudan and Afghanistan). We intermittently bombed, throughout the entire 8-year administration, the nation of Iraq, while simultaneously 'sanctioning' hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians to early graves. We launched an unprovoked war of aggression against Serbia, justified with stories of genocide and ethnic cleansing that turned out to be - surprise! - lies. We openly flaunted international law and then charged our victims with war crimes, even while openly celebrating our own war crimes. We meddled covertly in the affairs of countless nations. We enthusiastically embraced 'globalization,' 'free markets' and 'free trade.' We cheered welfare 'reform,' just as many of us now cheer Medicare 'reform.' We doubled the nation's prison population. We expanded the use of the death penalty and expanded the reach of the FBI and the CIA. We experienced 'terrorist' attacks at both the World Trade Center and the Oklahoma City federal building, and those attacks were followed by legislation that vastly expanded the repressive powers of the state, setting the stage for the even more repressive Patriot Act.
So what has changed? Very little, except that the volume has been turned up. And it will continue to be turned up. Because the bitch of it is, you see, that within a few years, the way things are today won't seem all that bad. But for the 'powers that be,' that hardly represents a crisis. To the contrary, it represents progress.
Now that was fun, wasn't it? Direct, lucid, honest, and untroubled by sacred cows or worse, sacred progressive icons. You see, progressives can be as much sheeple as the rest of the flock, ready to be razzled and dazzled by seemingly well-prepared and, well..... progressive folks who have established their credentials with limited hangouts that pass for anti-establishment investigation and reporting.
I don't often get into such groups and my experience with a crowd of progressive sycophants attending a lecture by David Barsamian is all that I can call upon at the moment. I recall the middle aged women swooning at every word as though it were the most precious substance on the planet. No one commented on his lack of comment about the anomalies in the evidence regarding 9-11. He is a close associate of Noam Chomsky, another swoonable icon of the progressive left. Both Barsamian and Chomsky keep the focus on the horrific results that accrue to a nation that causes so much suffering around the world . While that is a truism, it is NOT an explanation for the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
To my chagrin, I chose to remain silent in fear of the deadly damage possible at the hands of these worshipful groupies.
Mostly we think of propaganda as the ham-handed work of dull fascists or bright, amoral neoconservatives and boot-licking journalists protecting their paychecks and prerogatives among the lower level agents of the Illuminati and the New World Order. Their focus was defined by George W. Bush, joking at a Gridiron Club dinner, Washington, D.C., March 2001: "You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are the ones you want to concentrate on."
The rest are probably leftists and progressives who consider themselves too smart to fall for the crap that comes out of Townhall, Newsmax, WorldNetDaily, National Review or The Weekly Standard not to mention the mainstream corporate news. These come with so many holes in their facts and information that any fairly well informed progressive intellectual can easily see through it. When it has more holes than Swiss cheese and its twice as moldy as Limburger, I don't need it. If it was in my fridge I would get rid of it before it stunk up the house. If it's full of holes and can't be held up to the light, I call it a lie. When it stinks, I hold my nose and scold the liar who brought it in.
Progressive liars are more elegant, more subtle, cerebral. By constantly referring to our responsibility to change the way we interact with the world, the Gate Keepers of the Left attempt to control the debate and focus the action to maintain the fracas. Huey Newton, Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin were among those icons of the 70's who would lead their followers into protest after protest to set up the reaction that Spiro Agnew could sneer about or the police could crack down upon with a vengeance. Hard hats against college kids, National Guard rifles against innocent students. This set the visual memory of a generation and factionalized America. Divided we are conquered. Set into opposing camps and stirred with incendiary rhetoric we vent our anger against our countrymen while the Hand of the Illuminati steals our life, livelihood, and freedom one paycheck at a time and quietly runs a monetary scam that would be the envy of any counterfeiter or conman.
Now is a good time to notice who among the progressives is really a shill for the Illuminati agenda to establish a New World Order. Three years ago we had the opportunity to sort out the hidden hand from among the "progressives" and the "left." Those who blindly followed the Official Conspiracy Theory with limpid qualifications stood out like a sore thumb. Progressive icons like Democracy Now's Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, Norman Solomon, Counterpunch, and many others could be seen as the self-appointed Gatekeepers of the Left. You could recognize them instantly from their insistence on Arab hijackers despite the lack of evidence and the improbability that hijackers would do their training in the US, raise such a ruckus as to be noticed, manage to get the United Stats Air Force to stand down while four jumbo jets careened around the skies and headed toward restricted airspace for over an hour. These "progressive journalists" had no difficulty accepting the likelihood that a passionate, suicidal Muslim would abandon his Koran in a trash can at such a crucial time in his life or that when everything else was crushed and hammered to powder a passport of Mohammed Atta would miraculously show up in the street near Ground Zero.
Alternative/progressive news sites on the Internet are entering the political fray in seemingly blind support of John Kerry regardless of his actual stance on many substantive issues and his record of performance in Congress. He is not anti-war. He voted to allow Bush to choose war and has expressed the possible need to renew the draft. He is not a freedom fighter. He voted for the Patriot Act and has been involved in reducing constitutional protection under the rubric of fighting terrorism. He has not been a vocal critic of the Official Conspiracy Theory that was supposed to explain 9-11. Kerry has not sincerely searched for the truth. He covered up the drug dealing at the Mena Airport by not calling witnesses who had evidence to show that Bush and Clinton were both involved. Stephen Zunes has written:
Senator Kerry has also been a big supporter of the neo-liberal model of globalization. He supported NAFTA, despite its lack of adequate environmental safeguards or labor standards. He voted to ratify U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization, despite its ability to overrule national legislation that protects consumers and the environment, in order to maximize corporate profits. He even pushed for most-favored nation trading status for China, despite that government's savage repression of independent unions and pro-democracy activists. Published on Friday, March 5, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Kerry is a Zionist and he has told his Zionist audiences so He has pledged to continue Bush administration policy of vetoing any United Nations Security Council resolution seen as one-sided against Israel. He has hidden his Jewish bloodlines and allegiances to Zionism very well. And Zionism and America do NOT express the same ideals. Zionism is NOT democratic. Zionism is racist and elitist. Zionism is NOT Judaism. Many traditional Jews have been fighting the blasphemy and heresy of Zionism for over a century. Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, spokesman for Neturei Karta International has said,
Zionism refuses to accept our status as people in exile. This is metaphysical impudence. It is the task of world Jewry to remain patriotic citizens of the lands of their dispersion and pursue peace with all people. In the Holy Land, this means welcoming Palestinian sovereignty over the land. Accordingly, the rejection of Zionism is the only path to peace.
John Kerry is the white knight riding in to rescue us in this electoral charade set up to manipulate us into a fervor of support for the left hand of the Illuminati agenda. It happened before and we got continued attacks on Iraqis, the death of several hundred thousand Iraqi children, the bombing of Serbia and Kosovo, "depleted" uranium use in the Balkans that will poison the land for 4 billion years, NAFTA, executive orders that tightened the grip of the New World Order, and a carnival of leering old men distracting the national attention over Bill and Monica.
The world becomes less free and safe with each seesaw of the sham political freedom foisted upon the world as the more palatable of choices, democracy. The Illuminati understood democracy well: a medium by which they can manipulate people into choosing their own chains and ignoring the loss of freedom AND security. Huxley described this over half a century ago in the foreword to Brave New World:
"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers .... The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth."
What Americans and the rest of the world needs is honest, thorough reporting about BOTH sides of the Illuminati agenda, the left AND the right. "Anybody but Bush!" is a recipe for more and more of the same creep toward totalitarianism and slavery. Falling for the same electoral tricks plays precisely into the hands of the controlling "elite." We've done that throughout history. Little wonder the Illuminati look upon us as "goy," mere chattel dumbed down and ignorant enough to be corralled in a pasture of their choosing, prodded and enticed to do their bidding, and carted off to the knackery when no longer useful.
Now we have another litmus test thanks to Michael Ruppert: Peak Oil. As thorough as Mike Ruppert has been in providing investigation, analysis and reporting on a grand scale and as clean as his credentials seem to be, this sent a shiver up my spine when I saw what Mike says he advocates--convening world leaders to take "immediate steps to arrive at a crash program" ... " to arrive at the best possible and most ethical program of population reduction" as a response to Peak Oil. This is almost directly out of the ominous warnings in Limits to Growth from the Club of Rome. From the Rockefeller--funded work of Paul Ehrlich at Zero Population Growth comes their book: The Healing Planet - Strategies For Resolving The Environmental Crisis, Paul and Anne Ehrlich write:
"In this century, humanity has become a truly planetary ecological force, its effects going far beyond the transformation of the landscape to include altering the composition of the atmosphere globally, interfering with planetary nutrient cycles, modifying climate, and exterminating other life forms. In historical perspective, the switch - from a modest to an overwhelming scale of impact, and from a positive to a negative impact on carrying capacity - was almost instantaneous and monumental: human activities now appear to be lowering the long-term carrying capacity and incurring risks on a scale unimaginable less than a lifetime ago."
And, also, later in the book:
"Controlling population growth is critical. We cannot emphasize too strongly that significant resources must be directed into programs that limit population growth both in the United States and abroad. Because of the built-in time lags, unless the surge in human numbers is halted soon and a gradual population shrinkage begun, there is no hope of solving the problems discussed in this volume."
Now Michael Ruppert and his fans are talking about a crash program. Can you think of a crash program that would ethically reduce population in the next forty to fifty years? I can think of a lot of methods that could be utilized if one were unethical and despotic. But wait! The World Health Organization has come up with some real nifty methods to reduce the population growth in the Third World. Here are the known facts concerning the World Health Organization tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:
* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren't men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?
* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there -- in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been "contaminated."
* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections -- three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?
* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -- the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.
Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.
see http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm
Third World population is already being manipulated unethically without their consent. By establishing a rationale for population limitation, Ruppert et al are giving aid and comfort to the enemy among us who have their own ideas about depopulation. But if Peak Oil is a hard reality, shouldn't we be doing SOMETHING about our dilemma? Yes, but what if Peak Oil is based upon a fallacy, an unproved assumption of the finiteness of our primary energy source--the so-called "fossil fuels." What if oil is NOT a one-time, millions of years ago process involving accumulation of dinosaur goo? In a 1999 paper written by Thomas Gold on Recharging of oil and gas fields he states:
There have been numerous reports in recent times, of oil and gas fields not running out at the expected time, but instead showing a higher content of hydrocarbons after they had already produced more than the initially estimated amount. This has been seen in the Middle East, in the deep gas wells of Oklahoma, on the Gulf of Mexico coast, and in other places. It is this apparent refilling during production that has been responsible for the series of gross underestimate of reserves that have been published time and again, the most memorable being the one in the early seventies that firmly predicted the end of oil and gas globally by 1987, a prediction which produced an energy crisis and with that a huge shift in the wealth of nations. Refilling is an item of the greatest economic significance, and also a key to understanding what the sources of all this petroleum had been. It is also of practical engineering importance, since we may be able to exercise some control over the refilling process.
The debate about the origin of all the petroleum on Earth lies in the center of the subject. If we really knew that it is only biological materials, which, in their decay, could produce hydrocarbons, then the quantities that could ever be produced would be limited by the biological content of the sediments. But then the clear and strong association of petroleum with the inert gas helium would have no explanation; the finding of hydrocarbon gases, liquids and solids on most other planetary bodies in our solar system which have surface conditions quite unsuitable for surface life, could not be understood; the presence of hydrocarbons which we now find in abundance in basement rocks would also remained unexplained.
If we accept the fact, now known full well, that hydrocarbons are a common constituent of the cosmos and the planetary condensations that formed in it, then we have a totally different viewpoint. Hydrocarbons are stable down to great depths and the high temperatures there, contrary to many statements that have been made that the temperature reached at depths between 30,000 and 40,000 ft would dissociate most of the hydrocarbons. But these calculations are seriously in error, because they ignored the strong stabilizing effect of pressure at depth, that had been calculated by Soviet (Ukrainian and Russian) thermodynamicists.
Professor Gold concludes:
How much more than the original content of a hydrocarbon field can be produced in any one case will depend on numerous details of the formation, but present indications are that it is often at least double. The present global gas and oil glut appears to be due to this effect, and we have not yet seen the end of it, or any indication that it will end soon. Gas fields will be subject to faster refilling than oil fields, and moreover the volumes of gas in lower domains will in general be greater due to the higher pressures there and the higher compressibility of gas. Gas will thus become more plentiful than oil for this reason alone, but gas seems to be generally more plentiful and more widespread than oil. The environmental advantages of changing from coal or oil to gas, by far the cleanest of all combustible fuels, are very large, and the changeover is at present still handicapped by the mistaken belief that the supplies of gas will run out soon.
Professor Gold is by no means a lonely voice in this field. The issue of the origin of petroleum is fundamental to any determination about the end of petroleum. Ruppert et al not only do not address this issue, they fly into a hissy fit when the question is raised. This raises even more questions about their motivation as well as their fitness to represent important issues to the public. What if petroleum is not fossil fuel but a continually replenishing resource? We have grown up with the belief system of finite resources and fossil fuels. Where is the proof or even the evidence of this? Is there evidence to the contrary? Why have we not heard the full story? Why does the Ruppert group go ballistic when someone asks such a simple question? This suggests another agenda than waking the town to tell the people. Next is Dave's Newsletter # 52 in which Michael Ruppert attacks.
Originally published at http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr49.html
More research that punches a big hole in the Peak Oil hysteria
Peak
Oil Introduction: a Lesson in UN-learning
Scientific Abstracts on Peak Oil
Peak Oil scam promotes
depopulation
Peak Oil fraud based on ignorance
'Peak Oil' Team Sends in a Second Stringer
Mr. Peak Oil responds but avoids core issue
Peak Oil News Briefs
Rebuttal of article in Nature Reports
Exploration-Development of Dnieper-Donets
Long Term Global Energy Market
Ending the Debate on Peak Oil
Renewed Pessimism about Peak Oil
Debunking the 'Hubbert Model'
Peak Oil Myth
Proof
of the oil Non-Crisis by Lindsay Williams Lindsey
Williams, who has been an ordained Baptist minister for
28 years, went to Alaska in 1971 as a missionary. The
Transalaska oil pipeline began its construction phase
in 1974, and because of his concern for the spiritual
welfare of the "pipeliners," Mr. Williams volunteered
to serve as Chaplain on the pipeline, with the subsequent
full support of the Alyeska Pipeline Company. Because
of the executive status accorded to him as Chaplain,
he was given access to the information that is documented
in his book, "The Energy Non-Crisis," which
shows that peak oil is a scam because our domestic reserves
in the North Slope of Alaska alone are at least as large
as those in Saudi Arabia and are potentially large enough
to power the US with domestic oil for two
centuries. Recently this year,
due to the sensitive nature of his book, Mr. Willians'
life was threatened and he was forced to shut down his
web-site and stop selling his books and CDs. At
the urging of Dr. Stanley Monteith of Radio Liberty,
he called back the same oil executive who had warned
him about the danger he would be in if he continued to
disseminate certain information to ask if in fact there
was any information that he could in fact convey to the
public without upsetting the powers that be. The
oil executive, who Mr. Williams had known for years,
gave Mr. Williams some startling revelations which he
could safely reveal to the general public

The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, and
foreclosure. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been
taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild
dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government
of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
|
|


|

|
The
most effective CANDIDA
DEFENSE product
available. This proprietary formula is teeming with live bacteria
that start to work right away to help rid the body of tough
Candida organisms. visit
this site: ghtdirect.com/KARA
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|

|
 |
11/18/09
In the News
-Sen.
Dodd on Warpath Against Fed
-Rise
in soldier suicides leaves Pentagon looking for answers
-Computer
games fan 'planned school massacre'
-Woman
awarded $3M in assault claim against KBR
-Al
Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees
-Internet
Under Seige
-video Water
Drop at 2000 Frames per Second
-A
glitch causes widespread US air travel delays
-Students
storm UCLA building to protest expected UC system fee increase [Updated]
-Couple
arrested for not paying 18% tip...(say what?)
11/18/09
In the News
-Maersk
Alabama repels 2nd pirate attack with guns
-DEADLY PNEUMONIC VIRUS STRANGLES
UKRAINE
-Mexican
Government Admits ET's are Real!
-Washington
Post: D.C. quietly folds up police checkpoint program
-More
than $98 billion in improper gov't payments
-Washington
Post: D.C. to pay $450,000 to war protesters over 2002 interrogation
-Judge:
Corps' negligence caused Katrina flooding
-CHINA:Children’s
hospital doctor on duty playing games, 5-month-old baby dies
-Government
Web site says stimulus created jobs in nonexistent districts
11/17/09
In the News
-BOMBSHELL:
Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
-Man
says 30-foot 'monster' lurking in canals of Madeira Beac
-L.A.
water main breaks may be tied to reservoir, DWP says
11/16/09
In The News
-Farmers,
Ranchers Fighting Back Against FDA Tyranny Over Animal Farms
-AFGHANISTAN
/ THE BIG PICTURE
-Protesters:
IDF used .22-caliber ammo at West Bank fence
-Rabbit
Hole
-75,343
Bogus jobs 'created or saved' by the Stimulus
-Paul
Mirengoff: Why does he hate us? Barack Obama's America-effacing presidency
-Obama
- Don't Lecture China On Censorship
-Boy
on milk carton still missing after 30 years
-Girl's
body found in North Carolina, police say
-Oklahoma
doctor held in death of son, 9
-4.6
earthquake hits in San Bernardino County
-Millions
will have to repay part of tax credi
-Chinese
censors block Obama's call to free the Web
-AP
Poll: Americans fret over health overhaul costs
-Watchdog:
Gov't may have overpaid to bail out AIG
-Blue
lights installed in Tokyo train stations to stop suicides
-I
introduced Belle to vice girls: It showed her the 'human face' of
sex trade, says father
-Torture
Resisters Arrested at Fort Huachuca
11/15/09
In the News
-U.S.:
Army Sends Infant to Protective Services, Mom to Afghanistan
-HUGE
NEWS! FEDERAL JUDGE Carter sets Trial Date for Obama's Eligibility!!!
-Mystery
of Bangladesh's mass arsenic poisoning solved
-On
Abortion, Hypocrisy Reigns Among Blue Dog, Republicans & Christians
-A
Death in Tehran
-Pregnant
Women Reporting H1N1 Vax Miscarriages
-Fragile
Care Worsened Swine Flu in Ukraine
-Counties
in Kansas designated as disaster areas
-no
one at Columbia remember Mr. Obama
11/14/09
In the News
-AMERICA
IS ME
-Huge
Rise In Birth Defects In Falluja
-TV
evangelist jailed over child 'brides'
-Sleeping
boy attacked in Sydney home
-Obama
to attack guns as public-health?
11/13/09
In the News
-More
girls in India are refusing to become child brides
-NASA
finds water found on the moon
-Lawyer:
Accused Fort Hood gunman may be paralyzed
-Blasts
rip through Russian arms depot
-Facebook
crowdsourced investigation exposes vaccine denials of SIGA Technologies
-THE
REVOLT OF
THE FIFTH ESTATE / THE PEOPLE
-Suspect
sought in acid attack on South L.A. woman
-Woman ‘Incurably’ Crippled
by Vaccine Cured by Alternative Healer
11/12/09
In the News
-PREMEDITATED
MERGER
-Vaccine
Victims Blamed For National Emergency:
-How
the US army protects its trucks – by paying the Taliban
-Combivir:
The HIV Drug in Hasan's Shoe Box
-America's
Shameful Neglect
-Mujib
Rahman wanted to be the first Bangladeshi elected to New York's City
Council. His strategy: tell voters about his opponent's sexuality
-An
'Honor Flight' for WWII Vets
-Pressure
grows on Barack Obama as memos expose rifts over Afghan policy
-New
account of Fort Hood shooting may put another officer in spotlight
-Give
Us $7B or We Kill the Trees
-Bomb
hits Pakistan's spy agency in northwest
-Deputies
Hold Boy Who Fled Flu Shot
-Judge
Andrew Napolitano Natural rights Patriot Act - Part 3 of 3
-Join
reader action to educate the Associated Press about natural remedies,
alternative medicin
-Riverside
County prosecutors today announced a 155-count indictment in a large
public corruption investigation that includes charges against several
elected officials.
-Palin
in book: McCain aides kept me 'bottled up
-Feds
move to seize 4 mosques, tower linked to Iran
-Fed:
banks need customer consent on overdraft fees
For
more news
|


New information
on accessible
and affordable products that
kill mycoplasma and viruses!
GnRNV

Handcrafted Wood Gifts
Tired of trying to get that old tile
and grout clean?
Who You gonna call?
|

SALE
$2775.00 til 12/25/09
(free shipping up to $125
in continental U.S.)
The Ten minute exerciser,
all you have to do is find ten spare minutes a few times
a week to reach optimal results.
Whole Body Vibration is a fascinating new technology,
and is being used by celebrities
and athletes the world over. From hard bodies like Madonna and
Gwen Stefani, to champion Lance Armstrong, vibration exercise
is the choice among the fittest today. Many professional Sports
teams now use Whole Body Vibration in their training.
SALE $2775.00 till 12/25/09
(free shipping up to $125
in continental U.S.)
For more information on the Noblerex K1
Please Click Here |
|