by
Karen
Kwiatkowski
"A
constitutional statesman is in general a man of common opinions and
uncommon abilities."
~ Walter
Bagehot
In
2002, most of Congress eagerly bought the miracle cure from the
Ali Hakim in the White House. When push came to shove, we were all
entertained by congressmen and women who just couldn't say no. If only it
were a Rodgers and Hammerstein musical about a windy Midwestern state,
we'd have been just fine.
A
young David with five stones, standing alone against the mighty-looking,
well-armored Goliath, threatening with a full complement of his Philistine
brethren. That's a hero.
Politicians are rarely seen as the Davids among us. Yet, there were
six heroes in the United States House of Representatives in October
2002.
Not
surprisingly, one of them is Ron Paul of Texas. The other five are Jim
Leach of Iowa, John Hostettler of Indiana, Connie Morella of Maryland, Amo
Houghton of New York, and John Duncan of Tennessee.
These
six Republicans voted against the President's squealing, insistent,
irrational demand that he be immediately granted the right to "take
unilateral military action against Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq without
conditions except for Congress being informed."
These
six voted to restrain the President from his puerile urges for pre-emptive
attack and strategic occupation.
Today,
we hear the Senate describe
the outrageously false threat information the intelligence community
gathered on Iraq prior to the invasion. We hear that
Mr. Bush couldn't care less. He will continue with his preemptive
striking program even though its very justice relies on outrageously
accurate threat information.
Today,
we all know the information was lousy, misleading, uncertain, false and
manipulated.
But in
October 2002, a lot of people didn't know that the intelligence was bad,
and even more had no idea it could be politicized into a white propaganda
campaign promoting the urgent necessity for war. Too many trusting souls
in this country believed George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney had their
best interests in mind.
They
didn't.
What
makes these six folks heroes isn't that they saw through the lies being
told to them. It's not that they were smarter than everyone else in the
Congress. It's not that they are Republicans.
In the
face of pressure and insistent demands for their consent, their getting on
board, their approval, these are the men and women who just said no. In
the act of rationality, they infuriated the majority whip, the President,
the Vice President, the Project for a New American Century, the American
Enterprise Institute, and AIPAC too. Their words in October 2002 should
inspire us all, even today, as we struggle to deal
with
the dark and unmitigated political and operational disaster that is the
Bush-Cheney foreign policy.
Ron
Paul, Texas: "For more than a thousand years there has been a
doctrine and Christian definition of what a just war is all about. I think
this effort and this plan to go to war comes up short of that doctrine.
when we go to war through the back door, we are more likely to have the
wars last longer and not have resolution of the wars, such as we had in
Korea and Vietnam. We ought to consider this very seriously. . There is a
need for us to assume responsibility for the declaration of war, and also
to prepare the American people for the taxes that will be raised and the
possibility of a military draft which may well come."
Jim
Leach, Iowa: "The best chance we have to defeat terrorism and the
anarchy it seeks is to widen the application of law and the institutions,
including international ones that make law more plausible, acceptable and,
in the end, enforceable ."
John
Hostettler, Indiana: "A novel case is being made that the best
defense is a good offense. But is this the power that the framers of the
Constitution meant to pass down to their posterity when they sought to
secure for us the blessings of liberty? Did they suggest that mothers and
fathers would be required by this august body to give up sons and
daughters because of the possibility of future aggression? .'Don't fire
unless fired upon.' It is a notion that is at least as old as St.
Augustine's Just War thesis, and it finds agreement with the minutemen and
framers of the Constitution ."
Connie
Morella, Maryland: "Can I or can any parent look into the eyes of an
18-year-old boy and with a clear mind and clear conscience say that we
have exhausted every other option before sending him into the perils of
conflict? .The world is watching us today as we show how the world's last
remaining superpower sees fit to use its great influence. We are looked to
as we set an example for the world."
Amo
Houghton: ". with thousands of votes which we make over the years,
I have found that conscience is probably the best thing to follow and is
most honest if one is going to be true to one's self, if not always
politically popular. . Iraq is now one of the only secular countries in
that region. And the Sunnis and the Shiites could create such a mess
following a war that we could find ourselves against a religious
fundamentalist state ., where that is not the case now.
John
Duncan: Now there are some people here in Washington who seem to be
clamoring for us to go to war against Iraq. I represent a very patriotic
pro-military district in Tennessee. My people will strongly support our
troops if we go to war. But I can assure you that as I go around my
district I hear no clamor or even a weak desire to go to war against Iraq
.
Of
these six Representatives, only Connie Morella was not re-elected, in a
close race in a recently redrawn district. Imagine! Sticking to the
Constitution and an 83% percent chance of keeping your job? Sounds like
the American people might be smarter than Washington thinks.
Edmund
Burke wrote, "Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his
judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to
your opinion."
America and the Constitution were betrayed by the United States Congress
in 2002. We know it now. But the common opinions and uncommon ability of
Ron Paul, Jim Leach, John Hostettler, Connie Morella, Amo Houghton and
John J. Duncan should both inspire us today and set a new standard for the
109th Congress.
July 10, 2004
Karen Kwiatkowski [send
her mail] is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final
four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives
with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective for
militaryweek.com.
Copyright © 2004
LewRockwell.com (used by permission)

The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, and
foreclosure. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been
taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild
dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government
of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
|
|

