Pycnogenol: Who Owns the Rights?
|
|
For years a battle has raged in the courts and in the media about the ownership of the patent rights and trademark to Maritime Pine Plus®. Between 1969 and 1989, Jacques Masquelier, the original discoverer of the powerful anti-oxidant properties of the extract from pine bark, worked under contract for Horphag Research. Of course, the true discoverers of the health-giving qualities of the pine bark extract were the native people who lived along the St. Lawrence River where Jacques Cartier's second expedition was trapped in the ice. Nevertheless, Masquelier has claimed that he has the sole right to use the name for the oligotropic proanthocyanidin (OPC) product that he subsequently brought to the market place. Some web sites rail against Horphag, claiming that the French court has ruled against Horphag. The following is a press release from Horphag: PRESS RELEASE Guernsey, March 28th 2001. To this end the Grasse Court has ruled that the merger of SCIPA and CEP (partially owned by I.N.C.) is annulled for fraud and that I.N.C.'s exploitation of the Masquelier/OPC products under the '360 patent is fraudulent. I.N.C. and CEP were also enjoined under penalty of fine from exploiting the '360 patent. The court has ordered that the judgment be published in USA Today, Le Figaro and Le Monde. As a result, Horphag will be in possession of the entire ownership interest in the '360 patent and will be able to establish credibility and order in the U.S. market for proanthocyanidins, and especially in regard to its Maritime Pine Plus® French maritime pine bark extract product. Horphag Research has published more than 75 scientific publications on Maritime Pine Plus® French maritime pine bark extract during the last 10 years and has gained additional patents, particularly in the field of heart health and circulatory protection. Purchasers of Horphag's Maritime Pine Plus® product may rest assured in the primacy of their product. New York, February 24, 1999 --, Horphag Research, Ltd. continued to protect the integrity of its unique dietary supplement, Pycnogenol®, as evidenced in its recent victory against International Nutrition Company (I.N.C.) The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (T.T.A.B.) reaffirmed Horphag's rights to the trademark Pycnogenol®. Pycnogenol® brand French maritime pine bark extract is a unique natural extract of the French maritime pine tree (Pinus maritimus). Pycnogenol® is a unique "super antioxidant" that has been shown to possess many important health benefits, including: improving circulation of the blood, enhancing exercise endurance, maintaining the smoothness and elasticity of the skin, and prolonging the actions of vitamins C and E in the body. The T.T.A.B. dismissed the cancellation proceedings brought by I.N.C., finding that all I.N.C.'s claims had been determined in favor of Horphag in precedent cases. This company's recent win mirrors its past victories against several companies that had threatened Horphag's rights to the trademark name Pycnogenol® Misleading information from International Nutrition Company (INC) on the French Court decisions January 8th, 1999 On December 16th 1998, INC published a misleading press release. The Court of First Instance in Bordeaux had voided the succession of the joint ownership of the 360 patent, because Horphag Research had not been able to make use of its legal right of preemption. This cancellation has been confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Bordeaux, adding: "In absence of any agreement of the two parties or a decision of justice confirming the return of the patent rights to the company, Masquelier had actually no rights to the ownership of the 360 patent." This also applies to International Nutrition Company. Contrary to what INC states in its press release of December 16th 1998, the French Court decision is applicable in the United States according to International Private Law. American Justice is held to confirm this international reality and will have to signify to the United States Patent Office the annulment of INC co-ownership of the 360 patent. INC is very well aware of these facts and is looking for a way out, claiming that they will be able to market "Masquelier's Original OPC" under the 360 patent. Horphag's customers and consumers will not be misled by these shenanigans. The original Pycnogenol® comes from Horphag and Masquelier's OPC cannot be compared to our product. These are the facts that should be brought to the attention of consumers. The tactics of INC during and since the French Court proceeding has been to mislead Pycnogenol® customers, to make believe that INC regained rights to the product. INC and Masquelier have lost all rights. It is important to recall that the French High Court and the Court of Appeal condemned INC and Mr. Masquelier to pay all appeal expenses. These expenses are currently collected via the Sheriff's office. This is the truth that INC is attempting to mask Disclaimer: The statements on www.the7thfire.com have not been evaluated by the FDA. 
This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. (attributed to Voltaire), but certainly embodies what the 1st amendment of the constitution refers to as the freedom of speech 
Bill of RightsAmendment 1Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
|
|
For Email Marketing you can trust
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Queen
Victoria
