A society of sheep must in
time beget a government of wolves.- Bertrand de Juvenal
Mr. Sheeple:
This is the type of hate perpetrated by the "Indymedia"
website that you cherish so much as providing the "truth"!
WorldNetDaily
Student paper Tillman an 'idiot'
Sheeple Analyst: You sure have problem with hate. Seems to
be central tenet of your religion.
Mr. Sheeple:
You should squawk about hate! You sure have
expressed hatred for Bush, and cite all the real and imagined faults you
can. But when I point out the faultso of Clinton's 8 years, you wail that
I am expressing hate! Don't be so darned two-faced.
Sheeple Analyst: Getting quite testy when I hold up a mirror
to your behavior, aren't you? I can understand you wouldn't like what you
see. It is pretty ugly, but there it is, time after time....always feeling
more alive when you hate or when you think of Bill and Monica. I've been
picking on your buddy, too much? Only problem is that HE is now in office
and Billie isn't. Demanding that I not be lied to, have the Constitution
taken away, the economy in shreds, doesn't mean that I hate Bush. That
concept comes from YOUR upbringing, not mine.
Like you said. "Can't change the past." That's true. Can't understand why
you keep trying anyway, except for the buzz you always get when the
propagandists get you
Actually, Bush has done us all a great favor by being so brazenly corrupt
that only fools can fail to see how corrupt the US Government is in
toto. (I'm not talking about a dog, here, Dorothy). Never before in
history has the illusion been so clear and people begun to see truth of
the monster that faces them. Now we understand what is meant by the New
World Order. Now we can understand that we do NOT have to accept slavery
and oppression, but can stand fearlessly as Sovereigns with the knowledge
that NOBODY can really own us unless we cowardly accept such an abject
status.
I don't have to HATE winter to avoid shoveling snow. I can just go
somewhere else. I don't have to hate the rain. I can just stay inside for
a few hours or days. I don't have to hate limburger cheese. I can just
choose to not eat it. I don't have to hate sheeple; I can just choose to
laugh at their antics. I don't have to hate cowshit; I can just use it in
bags for the flowers. I don't have to hate writing responses to your
childish whining and pouting. I can just write it and post it for all to
see and enjoy. I don't have to hate the banks for stealing our country, I
can just help others get their freedom back. I don't have to hate haters
because I understand that hating is their way to express their emptiness
and self-imposed misery.
No, you can keep the hating all to yourself. I don't need it to make me
feel whole.
Sheeple Analyst sent:
Saddam SURVIVED politically because of assistance
from Reagan/Bush
Administration
Mr. Sheeple: No question that a
mistake was made in giving WMD to Saddam who was then a
friendly power. Since then, the U.S. has complied with an agreement to ban
WMD, but that does not mean Saddam would comply. At the time, the weapons
were not illegal, so what is the big deal?
Sheeple Analyst: It's about much
more than WMD. Is that all you could see? It's about support for a regime
that was using torture against its own citizens. The tortures you love to
describe were meted out during this time, too, and Ronnie the Great and
his sidekick George didn't mind a bit. Every one of those victims of
Saddam's cruelty had Ronnie and George to thank for keeping Saddam in
power. Friendly to whom? Not friendly to the Iraqis you love to bring to
this discussion. And your support for Reagan and Bush makes YOU an
accomplice, unwitting, of course, but that's the nature of being sheeple.
Mr. Sheeple: Guess your
"Bush-bashing" buddy, Michael Moore, has more going on than Bush regarding
the Carlyle group!
Also, it turns out tha Richard Clarke alone authorized the exit of the
Saudi royal family, rather than Bush, when the aircraft were grounded the
few days after 9-11-01. The reason, as Clarke stated on network television
news, was the Saudis feared a "lynch modb" after 9-11 and had to get out
in a hurry. According to your website and other sites, the claim that Bush
"authorized" the flight because of his interest with the Carlyle Group
(debunked by Newsday and others), is a lie. I suppose you will be
searching for a means of rationalizing that lie.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/6/27/120331.shtml
But it turns out that Moore, not Bush, may have the more active financial
relationship with Carlyle.
But Sunday's Newsday debunks his claim that President Bush has any
financial links to Osama's kin.
Sheeple Analyst:
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa. THIS is what you would call FACTS and LOGIC? Does
this mean that when Americans buy Russian Vodka that they are communist?
If a Catholic owns the grocery store you go to, does that mean you support
the Pope? If the gas you buy comes from Saudi Arabia, does this make you
Muslim? If you ride a bus manufactured by Japan, does that make you a
citizen of Japan?
OK, settle down here. Let's look at the logic. Does the fact that
Fahrenheit 9/11 is showing in theaters owned by a corporation in which
Carlyle holds stock prove that Michael Moore is on the payroll of Carlyle?
As I understand it, Loew has obtained the rights to make a big bundle of
cash by showing one of the top money-making films of the decade. Do you
have other information about that. That is just about the weakest excuse
for logic you have dumped on my doorstep yet. It's also another exhibition
of shabby journalism consistent with Newsmax's past "contributions." Now
get the shovel and get this shit out of here.
On the other hand, the fact that Carlyle Group is permitting the showing
of a movie that bashes Bush and the Saudis signals that there is another
agenda in play. At the very least the movie more deeply embeds the
official conspiracy theory in the consciousness of sheeple and lays the
groundwork for a future invasion of Saudi oil fields in a retribution
against Saudis as the war on terrorism expands..
I don't understand what you think this strange logic proves: that Carlyle
Group, bin Laden family, and Saudi royal family are in cahoots with
Michael Moore to bash Bush? What is your point? In the same breath you
excuse Carlyle from the "shadowy" business of war profiteering and then
seem to bash Michael Moore because Carlyle Group allows Loew to show
Moore's movie.
I don't recall mentioning anything about my relationship with Michael
Moore except to point out that he has largely adopted the official
conspiracy theory of Arab hijackers and bin Laden. So, a buddy of mine?
Not likely dickie buddy boy.
Guess the tabloids you read for information have splashed another
emotional, opinion-laden, smear of lies, innuendo, and half-baked nonsense
across your bow and you are delirious with righteousness. I can understand
your desperation in the face of all the truth starting to ooze out of the
Bush Liars' Clubhouse, but this tidbit is too hilarious.
Richard Clarke was an employee of the Bush Liars Club at the time, you
might remember and since then has continued to maintain the image of
al-Qaeda, even in his 'revelations' in testimony before various fora. You
seem to know nothing of techniques of propaganda. Clarke and Moore are
both using "limited hangout" in giving SOME solace to partisans of the
left while more thoroughly establishing the official conspiracy theory in
their consciousness. Yes, there are sheeple of the left as well as the
right.
If what Bath says is true, then it needs to be corrected wherever I might
refer to that on my website, but his simple denial is not satisfactory for
proof. However, it is hardly a vital piece of evidence in the solving of
this mass murder. So much other evidence abounds that the Michael Moore
film is not even necessary. But because of the sparks flying from left and
right, the official conspiracy theory continues in the national sheeple
consciousness because Moore doesn't even touch it. The relationship
between the Bush crime family and the Royal Saudi family is well
established and does not rest on references to Carlyle. Its' even
irrelevant since the existing evidence doesn't even point toward bin Laden
or the Saudis. That's the piece of evidence that is notably missing and as
a result you go doggedly snuffling around the propaganda pasture searching
for proof that pertains to al-Qaeda and Muslims and I am not even
bothering with those because there IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BIN LADEN'S OR AL-QAEDA'S
involvement in 9/11. NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE.
I find this article so ridiculous that I had to laugh that anyone would
read this tripe. For example:
Reports Sunday's New York Post: "The Carlyle Group - which [Moore]
bashes in the movie as some sort of shadowy war profiteering company - has
become part owner of Loews Cinemas, which is currently showing his film."
Does Carlyle NOT participate in the defense industry? "Some sort of
shadowy profiteering company" is obviously an attempt to cloud the nature
of the Carlyle business.
How much of Carlyle's bin Laden-tainted cash has found its way into
Moore's pockets - the portly propagandist isn't saying. Did Newsmax
ASK? Notice they didn't SAY that they asked.
Mr. Sheeple: No, I do not hate
anyone! That hate premise exists only in your own mind! I do, however,
disagree with his contentions in Bowling for Columbine, and his latest
Farenheit 9/11 based on hate that presents eroneous concepts as "fact"
both based on hate.
For example, consider his allegations regarding the NRA convention in
Denver concurrent with the infamous Columbine incident! Moore implies that
the "callous" NRA conducted their riotous meeting days after Columbine!
Remember, I have lived here for 25 years, and was living here when the
Columbine incident occurred. I know from first hand knowledge that the NRA
convention had been planned long before Columbine because I recall reading
newspaper articles about the NRA convention planned for April of '99 and
the revenue it would bring to the Denver Convention center! There was no
time to move it to another location because all attendees had already made
reservations, the convention hall was booked and paid for, and moving it
on a moments notice was impractical. After Columbine, out of respect, all
celebrations and other planned activities were cancelled as they held a
low-key routine business meeting. This was duly reported in the local
media!!!!!
And, it was months after Columbine, at an NRA rally in Charlotte, NC, when
after a speech as NRA President, Charlton Heston roused a cheering crowd
when he raised a rifle clutched in his hand and declared "Out of my cold
dead hands". But in his movie, Moore, as an anti-gun nut, implies that the
"evil NRA" composed of "gun nuts" as "potential killers" because they
owned guns was callous and brazen.
Sheeple Analyst: If you don't
hate anyone, why do you deluge me with writers whose expression is hate
and vengefulness. What attracts you to such writing? You disagree
hatefully and see hate all around you. You label Bush haters and Bush
bashers when people are simply disagreeing. Your inability to recognize
the specific instances when you demonstrate hatefulness and projection of
hate does not mean it is just an illusion. How are Michael Moore's
erroneous facts based on hate? Do you read his mind? What words did he use
that are hateful? Can you be specific? Erroneous facts are merely
erroneous, not hateful. They might even have been lies, but that doesn't
make them hateful.
If I had any positions vested in Michael Moore, I would take the time to
assert them from facts. But I have already determined that he is not to be
trusted with the truth any more than I would trust Newsmax, WND, Bush or
Cheney. I lost that trust when he supported General Wesley Clark. I didn't
know about his support for Nader. I was out of the country.
So you will have to berate someone else about Michael Moore. I'm not about
to waste time on him....or your vendetta. Or if you don't really hate
anyone, stop hating Michael Moore so much and go study the role of the
Mossad and Shin Bet in world terror and atrocities.
Mr. Sheeple: I could say the
same thing about you deluging me with hateful anti-Bush stories from the
"alternative media", so I guess it is a matter of perspective. Your past
reference to "baby Bush" was not exactly a term of endearment. And, all
the hateful and vindictive comments regarding dealing with terrorism based
on alleged facts from alternative sources spewing Bush and administion
hatred? I have a feeling that history will reveal that Bush did the right
thing. Eight years of Clinton's anti-military attitude as commander in
chief, taking puffball approaches to the various threats from the WTC
incident of '93 through to the Cole only encouraged the terrorists who
believed the U.S. was too much of a military wimp, and that prompted them
to take on the 9-11 action. But, surprise! The terrorists were probably
well aware that Clinton reduced the military by cutting whole divisions in
the Army and the Marines, cut squadrons from the airforce, reduced the
naval fleet plus cut their budgets to the extent there was no funds left
to train the military that was left after thousands of officers and
enlisted men got out of the military and what was left was living on
welfare and foodstamps. It is all true, if you are willing to research it
with the same dilligence you pursued antiBush stories.
Sheeple Analyst: You
could and do say whatever you like whether it is backed up by facts,
principles and/or logic. You blab opinion as though it is the most
precious information in the world. No substance, just belief piled on
innuendo supported by fantasy and lies. I present you with substantiation
and documentation and you spew rhetoric, polemics and bitter anger. You
see my hard facts, accepted principles, and sound logic as violations of
your sacred belief system and then project on me and others your infantile
view of the world. Your stupid repetition of alternative media is a
concocted lie based on your refusal to accept the establishment media that
I frequent with care in contrast to your bilious blather of unsupported,
inaccurate, and slanted excuse for honest journalism. You make nonsensical
assertions that are unsupportable in any reasonable arena (such as your
belief that Clinton's reduction of the military made it possible for
terrorists to fly all over the eastern half of the USA and directly over
military bases without even being challenged by interceptors of the USAF).
You've never explained how that specific occasion could happen and how
that connects to Clinton's wrecking of the military. You don't explain how
Clinton could have done that single-handedly when he was not in control of
the Congress from 1994 on. How could the Congress impeach him but they
could not prevent the gutting of the military? Impossible. You claim that
Reagan couldn't help the huge budget deficits because of the Congress and
then turn around to claim that Clinton was solely responsible for the
military crisis. How can both be true? How do you excuse Bush AND the GOP-
controlled House and Senate gutting benefits for GIs in the past 3 years
if you claim that it's all Clinton's fault?
You are preposterous in spouting claims
which you support only with fluff, nonsense and opinion. I don't need to
use hate. I have facts to back up fundamental principles, anchored in
cogent and precise logic. You don't even know facts when you see them, you
don't understand principles and intellectual honesty, and you couldn't
identify a carefully stated syllogism if it had a label. How can I say
this? Do I just have an opinion about this? No. I have your words
documented in black in white and I keep throwing the facts back and you
can't stand the truth. it is at best an inconvenience for you. And at
worst you simple-mindedly label it hate.
Mr. Sheeple: A
"crappy propaganda film" that reflects exactly that which you have been
claiming for the last 2.5 years? Moore could very well have been reading
your website. I find it amusing that you called Moore's film a "crappy
propaganda film", but when I express a distaste for that same film in a
previous email, you replied by accusing me of HATE! Doesn't your question
below (Does losing your lying, war monger Fuhrer! ) constitute HATE?
You are contradicting yourself. Is it Hate only when I express my beliefs,
but not when you express yours?
"Guilt by Association again. Brazen propaganda technique to stir you into
action. Such propaganda crap about a crappy propaganda film. Don't you
have something useful to do? Does Michael Moore frighten you that much?
Does losing your lying, war monger Fuhrer! make you feel less secure"
(From previous email regarding Communists loving Moores movie)
"And your support for Reagan and Bush makes YOU an accomplice, unwitting,
of course, but that's the nature of being sheeple.from this email: Isn't
this also GUILT BY ASSOCIATION?
Sheeple Analyst: Hate
is an emotional state induced by fear, lies, and disinformation. Is there
a "nice" way to say that Bush is a liar? "Liar" is not necessarily an
emotional, inflammatory descriptor when the evidence demonstrates that it
is true. If it can be demonstrated that Bush has lied, then "liar" is a
logical descriptor. Of course, Kerry is a liar, Moore, Clark, and many
others on the left are also liars. The hate articles about Moore that you
have presented even use language that are irrelevant to an intellectual
discussion such as "fat" and "ugly" which only are personal attacks on
Moore's body and demeanor. As such they are used to derogate Moore's
physique. I hope you can see how that is hateful. I've addressed this
directly before. I'm disappointed that you didn't learn it then.
If you look up the definition of warmonger in the dictionary you will see
that it has real use in description. I use "warmonger" in its proper
context and with facts to support its use. Without facts, the use of the
word, "warmonger," WOULD be an emotional, hateful word. I've done my due
diligence in gathering and presenting the facts. Therefore, I don't HATE
Bush, I just reveal his true nature by his actions and his words. That's
easy to do in your case as well.
I have been telling you for the past two years... and more... about the
Arab hijackers not being a proven allegation. You don't seem to hear that.
You won't allow it into your frame of reference even to examine the
hypothesis carefully and honestly. YOU think that the contents of my
website conform to the Arab Hijacker Conspiracy Theory but you are 180
degrees wrong. That's how much you REALLY know about what I present on The
Seventh Fire. NOTHING. Just hot air from your fevered imagination creating
a legend in your own mind.
The difference between the way I describe Moore's flick and yours is that
I back it up with facts and you just bring on opinionated bluster and
baloney from the right. You describe it as "expressing beliefs." But yours
are backed up by opinion and mine by facts. You don't seem to see the
difference.
Guilt by association is much different than guilt by support. If you are
in the same theater as Saddam Hussein, that does not make you a sadistic
criminal. On the other hand, if you promote, advocate, and support the
criminals who in turn promote, advocate, and support another sadistic
criminal, you ARE linked and guilty as an accomplice to the sadistic
torturer and murderer. You helped Reagan and Bush gain their office,
maintained support for their regime, and advocated that others join you in
this support. Therefore what they did is blood on their souls and blood on
yours. You can change this. But you likely will rationalize it by trying
to vilify me, the messenger, or simply forget it as an uncomfortable
proposition. Right action is always your choice.
Sheeple Analyst sent:
"TheNewOrleansChannel.com - News -Bush Seeks To Void Damage Award To Gulf War POWs"
Mr. Sheeple:
"The Justice Department says foreign policy
interests are at stake, and that
the POWs' claims should be handled through diplomatic channels rather than
the courts."
Hardly enough information to make a judgement on facts rather than
political
animosity.
Sheeple Analyst: That's how you support the troops?
"Well, I' don't know. It's all kind of confusing, you know....foreign
policy interests at stake.....not enough information here to get upset.
Just some dumb soldiers want a handout maybe....can't really make a moral
decision on that....gotta go back to my trains.....toot, toooooot
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz"
I thought the military rule was never leave your buddies behind? You
obviously don't give a shit. Why is that?
Mr. Sheeple:
That is your asinine interpretation of what I
said! Not enough information on which to make a rational judgement on
facts rather than political concerns as in your case!
It is interesting to note that you talk about becoming "spiritually
prepared" for coming earth changes etc. concerned about love and all, then
you express hate toward anyone who dares to not blindly accept your
concepts? As I have stated in the past, you are a legend in your own mind
in the sense that what you believe is the "gospel" you expect your
following as "sheeple" to accept and believe.
If you cannot be civil, then do not bother me.
Sheeple Analyst:
What's so hateful about my comments? Did I
dig you deeply enough to feel? At least you feel your own pain, but you
are very comfortable about the pain and sacrifice of others. I am intent
on comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable as a double
whammy to bring awareness and justice. You feel it because your comfort
was disturbed and therefore I must have been "hateful." Stop groveling in
your self-pity. Take responsibility for your actions. If you vote and pay
to send people to war, then you carry an extra responsibility that the
consequences of your actions are attended.
Your characterization of "following" and "sheeple" reveals your belief in
an ideology that is not at all removed from your former churchianity
except for the decorations. You don't seem to understand that spirituality
is not just prayerful meditation and passivism. Being civil is another
artificial way of being "nice." True civility would mean that you would
wish to find out how to help those grunts left behind by a leader who
steals from them to line his cronies' pockets. True civility does not hide
behind excuses but stands firmly for justice and honor. That is exactly my
question to you: WHERE IS YOUR CIVILITY? WHERE IS YOUR CIVIL
RESPONSIBILITY?
Did I hurt your feelings because I challenged you to stand up and be
responsible for the phony baloney you have stuck to for a lifetime because
you were too afraid to search for what is true? How long will you run and
hide from honor and responsibility? If you cannot be civil then don't be a
blowhard about war, appeasement, and the death of innocents at the hands
of thugs.
Sheeple Analyst:
You can download Michael Moore's film on
the internet and then burn it. That should give you some
satisfaction.
Moore: "pirate
my film, no problem" (4 July 2004)
Mr. Sheeple:
Just because I do not agree with Micheal
Moore's film, why should I download it and burn it? I am more mature in
thinking than to peform, or even advocate, such childish thinking and
action as you suggest! Your statement below is as absurd as your message
the other day bitching about my alleged hatred, just because I expressed
my objection to Moore's film rather than slobber all over it as you
apparently do because it reflects that on your thinking as per your
website. Niether Moore's film or your website content is of interest to
me.
Sheeple Analyst:
Just a joke, Dick. You seemed to be so
steamed up about Michael Moore, I thought a good catharsis was called for.
I didn't even suggest that you watch it. You don't have to read a book to
be able to burn it. Just get the satisfaction of burning that which you
have decided is evil. Or not. Didn't have to get so intemperate about it.
That just shows how deeply you are at the affect of whatever.
Could you document for me what I might possibly have said to give you the
illusion that I was slobbering all over Fahrenheit 911? In fact, Moore
runs counter to much of what I have been telling you for the past 2 years.
See, that's the language of hate in which you make up something about me
that has nothing to do with anything I had said or done to warrant such a
comment. It's your own mind that's churning out the hateful images.
Lumping me with Moore is your way of excusing yourself from ever finding
the truth. You've made up your mind ahead of time despite evidence to the
contrary. THAT'S PREJUDICE and the seed of IGNORANCE..
On the other hand, although I can document that Newsmax and WND are
frequently far afield from the truth, I still go there to see what has you
so worked up. And when I come away from that amazing experience, I have a
treasure trove of lies, innuendo, and disinformation. You could apply the
same attitude of inquiry to my website or, for that matter, Michael Moore.
It seems, though, that you are fearful of losing your programmed ideology.
It's rather like a vampire avoiding the light because he knows that he
cannot survive in truth. Your world cannot withstand the light of truth so
you must fight constantly to find the dark places of the soul. It is a
Faustian bargain.
And I wasn't bitching, although you probably preferred to hear it that
way--easier to dismiss. I was observing a trait that seems to keep you
immobilized in the ideology of your current choice. Hatred is the means to
build the walls that give you false comfort. Such a fear of reality stunts
and deforms. But everyone gets to choose how they will use this life.
Mr. Sheeple:
The alleged Carlyle group connection, the war
over oil allegation,, to name two examples of many I have found on your
website.
The
Carlyle connection of bin Laden's and Bush? That was a fact pre-911. War
over oil? Was not the Ministry of Oil protected immediately by the
"Coalition" but the nuclear facilities left unguarded and stripped of
sensitive WMD equipment and materials? These are facts, Dick, not owned by
Moore or anybody else. You begrudge me using facts?
But then, you have not spent much time discovering what I REALLY promote
as true facts, principles, and/or logic. If you had, you would have
discovered the section on Peak Oil in which I point out that this is
hypothesis is not only incorrect and misleading, it is actually part of
the Illuminati propaganda. Those who are talking Peak Oil on the left are
either sadly mislead or witting accomplices.
In the past two years I have sent you many examples that directly reject
the position that the Saudis were guilty or that the sole purpose was oil.
From September 8, 2003 I had said:
Where is the clear evidence that Osama bin
Laden and al Qaeda were involved?
From May 22, 2003
Somehow you have missed in all of our
conversation that I don't trust Gore either. I wouldn't trust Clinton,
either. Still, you keep bringing it up. You haven't heard me say that I
not only don't trust the Democratic candidates, I don't trust the US
corporate media no matter what shading you place on them. I don't trust
liberals anymore than I trust conservatives, especially neo-liberals and
neo-conservatives. I don't trust liberal commentators OR conservative
commentators. I don't worship at the altar of Rachel Carson or Paul
Ehrlich. I don't trust the anti-war group ANSWER because of their
authoritarian leanings any more than I trust Pat Robertson's 700 Club or
Joseph Farrah's Take Back America. You still don't understand that the
Soviet style of socialism was supported by the financial elites as much as
the Nazi style of socialism. They worked BOTH sides and you just want to
take sides and lob verbal grenades. Either way you support the coming
Fourth Reich. Those supporting Lieberman or Kerry are doing the same. Your
language is rife with partisanship and that's an indicator of the trap
most people are caught in.
Does THAT sound like I'm gung-ho to jump on
Michael Moore's bandwagon? I know you can't keep up with the amount of
information on my website, but these are my thoughts and positions
directly to you and you think I am a buddy to Michael Moore? Only
selective forgetting can accomplish this amnesia.
On the website:
9-11 has shown the face of
the NWO Three
elements of a criminal investigation are motivation, means, and
opportunity. Evidence is gathered to fill in the details in each of these
categories. Anomalies, contradictions, and gaps in that evidence suggest
that a probable scenario for 9-11 is a false flag operation in which the
perpetrator tries to place blame for a criminal act on an innocent
individual or group.
Rumsfeld a Co-conspirator It was not Osama bin Laden, but Donald H.
Rumsfeld who has earned his place in the history books as the "American
Taliban 2."
Evidence of Corporate Guilt
When the crashes take place -- word
merely has to be put out by those involved (the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and
those complicit in the Bush Administration, (based on his behavior, my
money is on Paul Wolfowitz) to push the theme that bin Ladin was
responsible and that this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the
only immediate appropriate reaction
Colonel Donn de Grand-Pre Interview
Interview And as we delved into that, we found that the culprits,
including Rumsfeld, were part of a neocon group that had been planning
this thing for literally years prior to September 11th.
9-11 a Mossad-CIA "False Flag
Operation Von Bülow
told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad,
is behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were
carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military
and security spending
Turning over Stones Finds Israeli Mossad
A Plantation, Florida police officer
working closely with the FBI stated in a phone interview that at least
five moving companies are currently under investigation. With nationwide
allegations of incredible amounts of moving fraud and extortion by
Israelis in the months before the September 11th attacks, it is no
surprise that the government has taken interest. Unfortunately, the
interest seems to be fleeting when faced with the lawyers and ambassadors
that Israel has on its side. The young men from Urban Moving Systems who
were detained after jumping up and down and laughing while taking pictures
of the burning World Trade Center have already been deported.
9-11 a Day of Infamy and
Betrayal 9/11 was
a Day of Infamy in which the US government killed its own people
9-11 "Hijackers" Still
Alive Because the
IDs used by the hijackers were phony, we cannot know who they really were
or who they really worked for. But what is apparent is that those who
planned the hijackings and the 9/11 attacks went out of their way to leave
plenty of clues pointing to citizens of middle eastern Arab nations. This
opens up a whole Pandora's box of unanswered questions.
First and foremost of which is this: why would Osama bin laden, the Saudi
Arabian caveman, steal identities? To cover his tracks you say?
Next question: why would a Saudi Arabian, attempting to cover his tracks,
steal the identities of....fellow Saudi Arabians??? What would be the
point? Why go you through the trouble of stealing identities that would
point back to you? Why not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian
identities, or Turkish ones (or Israeli ones)? A much more logical
conclusion is that non-Arabs stole these identities as part of a "false
flag" operation designed to point the blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabs in
particular.
Framing bin Laden
The Taliban offered to turn bin Laden over to a neutral party if the US
provided any evidence to them that he had anything to do with the 1997 US
African embassy bombings or the 9-11 attacks. The evidence was never
presented to the Taliban for two reasons:
-
There was never any evidence, not even
circumstantial
-
The war to replace the Taliban with a US
puppet government was already in motion. The 9-11 attacks served as the
perfect excuse, the "incident" to win the support of the American people
and kick off the war.
Well, that's just scratching the surface,
but I wouldn't wish to exhaust you in actually doing a bit of research. I
brought a few to place in your lap so you might at least sample the facts.
Do you see the difference between facts and vague unfounded, undocumented
allegations? Well, it would be an epiphany if you did.
Mr. Sheeple:
Just a joke? Really? Is that a "Fonzie
moment"?
Sheeple Analyst:
Oh, quit bein' so jealous of the Fonz...just
because he wasn't cowed by the system, programmed by the militaristic
regimen of school and society. Remember that the only one who lived free
on Happy Days was the Fonz. He always made the adults and programmed kids
look stupid, which they were. The Fonz was always on top of things, fully
aware and therefore could make his way in the world with ease. Chicks
loved Fonz because he was an original, a free thinker, a rascal, but
always lovable and charming.
Too bad you have such a poor attitude about the Fonz. You could learn a
lot from him. But you won't. You can't operate that far from your tether.
You'll never know the experience of the Fonz because you have been
programmed for fear and insecurity. And you refuse to try to reparent your
little dickie because ........ what? What are you afraid of? Afraid to
fly? Soar? OK, be a lizard hiding in the rocks. Maybe in another lifetime
you will try out your wings.
Mr. Sheeple: Suffice it to say that
reading about the Moore movie reminded me of your conspiracy emails etc
over the last 2 years, and the stories on your website. At least the items
that existed a while back if you have no taken them down.
Sheeple Analyst:
Vague recollection is a useful excuse for
making up legends in your own mind about me. I've been consistently saying
for months that Arab hijackers are only an unsubstantiated Official
Conspiracy Theory. In fact, Michael Moore goes a long way toward
supporting aspects of the Official Conspiracy Theory you adhere to. You
actually have much more in common with Michael Moore than I do. You
believe bin Laden did it. You believe that Arabs did it. You believe that
Muslims did it. You believe al Qaeda did it. Much of Fahrenheit 9-11
supports that....from a left propagandist.
I've been saying for months "prove to me that al-Qaeda was involved in
9-11" as you went about various ploys to entrench the al Qaeda program
deeper into your organic computer.. When you persisted in running into the
same non sequitir that "al Qaeda was involved with Saddam," "that they
trained in Iraq," "that al Qaeda is responsible for all the terrorism in
the world," Like an EverReady bunny I kept a constant tattoo "show me the
evidence," "show me the evidence" over and over because you didn't seem to
get it that I wasn't going to fall for the lie.
Now comes Michael Moore blabbing the same crap YOU have been prattling
about al Qaeda and Arab hijackers and you lump ME together with HIM!!! Is
that insane or what?
If my website has changed it's because my understanding of what is going
on is different now from what it had been. I learn from the patterns that
I see. I DON'T have an ideology to protect. All ideologies need protection
from the truth and I am on a hunt for the truth with NO programs holding
me back. It might be very uncomfortable for you to leave your tight
protective program to soar free, but that's you. I've never been
comfortable with limits and restrictions. You keep repeating that I am
trying to fit the facts to my ideology, but I won't allow any ideology to
stand in the way of truth. You don't seem to understand how important
truth IS....at all levels.
If you haven't noticed the changes it's because you can't even understand
changing your own mind when new facts, principles and/or logic show the
path to truth. It's YOUR loss that you cling to lies at all costs instead
of soaring free to find truth at all costs. You don't yet know freedom
until you experience that.
This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that
we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer,
told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me
to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture?
Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does
this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead
of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really
are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. (attributed to Voltaire), but certainly embodies what the 1st amendment of the constitution refers to as the freedom of speech
Bill of Rights
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Queen
Victoria
