Here is evidence supplied by
the Head of Security of the WTC on network television indicating that
the FBI floors (the 22nd, 23rd and 24th floors) of the North Tower -- 70
floors below the crash bombing impact -- had been devastated and reduced
to debris that this same Head of Security himself dug through to get to
trapped persons (whom he saved). But it was on these floors that the
entire accumulation of evidence and investigation briefs on two highly
important cases were being stored: 1) the case against Mobil Oil and
James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan (at that
time before a New York grand jury as described in great detail by
Seymour Hersh in the July 9 New Yorker magazine); and, even more
important, the evidence in the investigation of gold price fixing
stemming from charges brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company,
Goldman Sachs. (see below for full reconstruction of this crime -- that
is now all but confirmed by this revelation of a bomb devastating the
FBI floors of the North Tower before the tower collapsed.)
At noon I received a phone call
from New England from Steve. He was reviewing recorded footage of
coverage of the destruction of the WTC on NBC's program "48 Hours."
Steve has reviewed the footage many times and taken detailed notes. I
took notes at my computer as he spoke.
After the south tower collapsed, men went up to the 22nd floor of the
WTC and "dug" someone out of the "rubble" he found there. {It is known
that these floors contained the New York FBI offices -- Peter Jennings
actually did a two-day network news story on the effects of the
destroyed evidence and files on American financial crime investigations
around the world.]
The 48 Hours anchor was interviewing the Head of Security of the WTC
about the evacuation who had received a call, after the South tower was
down, from the Port Authority's Command Center on the 22nd floor asking
for rescue. The Head of Security himself traveled to that floor in the
company of a NY Fireman where they found the offices devastated to the
point where they had to "tunnel through debris" to "dig out" the two or
three Port Authority workers who were trapped there.
All of this happened 73 floors below crash-bombing impact.
The man who called me about this -- Steve from Main -- said that he had
received a copy detailing the evidence for a terror frame-up from one of
the hundreds of people pester with my posts each day (whose name I
recall from my address book) -- and that he had been reviewing three
lists of occupants of the WTC.
He gave the sites for two different listings of WTC tower occupants,
which I copied as follows:
http://www.cnn.com/special/2001/trade.center/tenants1.html
tenants by floor and sq footage; and
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/article/tower1.html
occupation my tenancy.
He noticed from these that listings were given for all floors EXCEPT
floors 23 and 24, immediately above the location of the call for
"digging out" rescue -- indicating that the debris had fallen down from
a destructive event occuring on the floor directly above.
Steve left off with this statement (which I am not able now to confirm
or disconfirm): "The Murrah Building in Okalahoma City was where all of
the records of the Waco Seige were being kept. I think this is their
MO." Meaning their modus operandi -- i.e., their distinctive pattern of
crime.
Here is the post that prompted Steve's phone call:
Below I present what I think are incontrovertible reasons for concluding
that the WTC/Pentagon crash bombings were a frame-up designed to benefit
members of, at least, these four groups:
1) people profiting from the
opium trade of the Northern Alliance drug lords and the
money-laundering through global investment channels that the opium
trade and the derivative heroin trade supports;
2) people seeking control of the $6 trillion worth of oil and natural
gas in Central Asia;
3) people seeking to win back support to increasingly unpopular
Sharonist policies in Israel; and
4) people arraigned before a grand jury on charges of fixing gold
prices, illegal involvement in oil swaps between Kazakhstan and
(sanctioned) Iran, and bribery in cases where all incriminating
documentary evidence was stored in FBI files and data banks in one of
the twin towers of the WTC.
All four of these groups have
fluid secret channels of communication through networked integration of
banking, politics, the CIA and Mossad connections. The fact is if one of
these groups was complicit the other three would have to be also.
Here are three independently developed arguments.
1. Best guess
origins of the WTC/Pentagon crash-bombing frame-up.
Mossad and the CIA were supporting traffic in Afghan-opium-derived
heroin -- devoting public resources to protect and assist the suppliers
and distributors of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered drug
revenue deposits backing the global investments of American and British
elite finance. The Afghan Northern Alliance drug lords grow 70 to 90
percent of the worlds opium, the prime ingredient of heroin The opium
which is moved across the small China-Afghan boarder for processing and
distribution by the giant People's Liberation Army, that amazing
transnational corporation, Triad drug cartel-and military super military
establishment all in one. Against the tremendous-stake interests this
giant outlaw network, the morally conservative Taliban had been
eradicating Afghan opium production, suppressing supply to drug lords
and the drug-revenue flow money- laundering establishment bankers and
global investors alike.
Thus "crisis" became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA
and/or Mossad in seeking ways to defeat Afghanistan's Taliban
government. (Nothing absurd so far, right?)
Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have criminal ties to U.S. executive
James Giffen in Kazakhstan -- a man under investigation by a New York
grand jury in the months before September 11 for illegal involvement in
an oil swaps between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran (source: the Aug.
9 New Yorker Magazine for a full account of this by Seymour Hersh -- and
all of the evidence for this crime was being kept at the WTC on the 20th
through 25th floor of one of the twin towers where the FBI had its New
York Offices. And James Giffen is the key man everyone has to go through
to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan -- including any pipelines
built that would traverse Afghanistan. (There is $6 trillion dollars
worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.) Giffen certainly understood -- if
he did not originate the idea -- that if he could get operatives (even
"captured" vengeful Islamic activists whose rage could be shaped and
directed to use of terror) to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC
building and the documentation evidence it contained, then he would be
escape grand jury indictment -- and, as an powerful added benefit, the
(framed) Taliban would get replaced with a regime in Afghanistan that
would permit a pipeline to be built -- preferably a Northern Alliance
drug lord government that would harmonize with Giffen's own unethical
(murderous) entrepreneurial style. (See the New Yorker article
for details of Giffen's history.)
(So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people--
Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen - renegade CIA or a Giffen
"dark-side" Mossad link. But other, even more powerful players may have
had involvement -- certainly they stood to gain tremendously if the
crash bomb frame-up were successfully accomplished. (Prior to September
11 charges had been brought against Alan Greenspan (forgive me -- in a
previous post I said "Milton Friedman" instead of Greenspan -- Friedman
is a great and honest and honorable academic scholar and Nobel Prize
winner -- who, very superficially, looks like Greenspan) -- at any rate,
Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan & Co. and other powerful American
financial figures and institutions had charges brought against them --
reportedly a very well-documented case --over the fixing of gold prices
-- with evidence for that case too stored by the FBI on the FBI floors
of the WTC! These parties would not only profit heavily from the
"carrot" of both oil and drug monies circulating through their great
financial institutions, but they also would gain from avoiding the
"stick" of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the
U.S. financial establishment (realize what a guilty verdict in this case
would mean to these leading financial families and to the Establishment
in general!) -- these parties would welcome predictable and certainly
substantial benefits from the the destruction of the evidence in the WTC
and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.)
Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives who
characteristically operate in secret and under the protection of wealth,
status and power -- both the carrot ($2 trillion in annual drug revenues
funneled through the banking system -- which has funded much of the
proceeds to fund the development of the Princeling-Triad dictatorship in
China, btw, -- (The communist government has been in the opium business
since the 1930's -- Mao pioneered the model later followed by Peru's
Shining Path and Colombia's Maoist F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists. And Zhou
Enlai devised the plan in the 1950's of weakening American society
through a drug invasion.)
"China white" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army, made
from Afghan opium links all banker and oilman to the corrupt and
renegade the secret state agencies, CIA, FBI, and Mossad -- renegade
agents of either agency may have seen this opportunity for mutual gain
and found the way -- having profiles of each of the players -- to
propose the crash bombing frame-up as the best "solution" to each of
players most troublesome problems, while making enormous profits
besides.
Note that the Bush's are tied to both the CIA and oil and, through Mena
Arkansas drug smuggling and through the Iran-Contra drugs and arms deals
etc. (drug world investigator Daniel Hopsicker, as well as Noam Chomsky
and many others have exposed this thoroughly -- at least in the broad
strokes necessary to support this reconstruction of the crime.) (The
facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from the Russians,
to the John Birchers, to Wired Magazine, Harpers, New Yorker, the
Village Voice, the Nation, and Rolling Stone Magazine, all having
explored the drug - Establishment connections in great detail.)
Which brings us to Ariel Sharon. His hard-head policy of retaliation
regardless of collateral damage and his provocation at the mosque cost
him dearly in world opinion. In fact the Bush administration was very
close to making initiating a major policy shift -- obviously known to
Sharon from the greatest intelligence organization in the world -- Bush
was planning the recognition/sponsorship of a separate Palestinian
state. (Also war crime charges had been brought against Sharon in
international court, further putting his hard-line policy against the
Palestinians in unfavorable light.
Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely possible
that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that thought of the crash bombing
frame-up plan in the first place decided to take the risk of telling
Sharon about the plan, offering it as a solution to the trapped old
"freedom fighter's" problems as well. If the U.S. could be made to think
that the hated Osama bin Laden -- that Islamic fundamentalism itself --
is responsible for destroying twin towers of the WTC and the American
government itself, then, Sharon would certainly grasp, American opinion
would radically swing to an extremely hard line against all Moslem and
Arab entities not securely under their thumb, and most particularly,
from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.
No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not close on
such a deal, such a serving of his higher good, his prime directive.
And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation.
The getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair.
Mossad has infiltrated bin Laden's forces in Central Asia and the
Mideast -- but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must
be to remain viable) and so it was an easy matter for this "dark-side"
Mossad, with Sharon's clandestine approval, to trick some very angry and
vengeful Arabs into thinking they were doing bin Laden's or some other
anti-Zionist or anti- Globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four
planes. Millions in the world hated the America and the globalization
that the World Trade Center represents. These recruited hijackers need
not have been Arabs -- there are Croats, Serbs, Latin Americans, and
Iranians and any number of other victim-pool people who could have
volunteered to conduct the hijacking -- possibly without fully
understanding the end result of the mission -- they need not have
"signed on" for a suicide bombing. (Many aviation experts on the net are
describing a system built into commercial airliners for taking over
control of flight from the ground, a system developed to combat
terrorism. It is possible that the course of the plane's flight was
taken over by this system installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in
several reports on the web.) But if the crashes were not effected in
this way, psychological-control methods, wholly sufficient for the job,
were also available. The technology of behavior control is further
advanced than the popular press has made people aware. Skilled psyop
agents can get subjects angry enough and convinced enough of the justice
and good effects of "acts' represented as serving their 'cause" to be
willing to undertake even suicidal missions. (Activist Alan Yu has
researched this technology as have other researchers from a broad
spectrum of political orientation.)
And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act.
But then what?
When the crashes take place -- word merely has to be put out by those
involved (the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and those complicit in the Bush
Administration, (based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz)
to push the theme that bin Laden was responsible and that this
aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only immediate
appropriate reaction -- since, the spin goes, the Afghans are
responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and that "harboring is exactly the
same as terrorism" and that for that reason the entire Afghan government
must be terminated (must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's
revealing phrasing of September 12.)
The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the perpetrators.
Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting that for the sake of the
security and safety of Israel and the United States that it is necessary
that the impression of an "open and shut case" must be spun. (The news
media is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime correspondents"
and sets about selling the blaming of bin Laden and advocating war and
overthrow in Afghanistan -- because they have been deceitfully led to
believe they really know who bombed the buildings; and among the elite
of the news publishers, they "know" it is in the best interests of
Israel and Wall Street that this be the response, that this be the spin.
And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.
And trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and suppress criticism of
the investigation -- after all, who would know better than the CIA and
Mossad exactly who is responsible? (The fact has been reported -- in a
different context, of course -- that the U.S. intelligence receives all
of its ground intelligence from Central Asia through Mossad's network of
infiltrator spies -- in other words, whatever "proofs" the U.S. has (and
has shown Tony Blair and NATO) has come exclusively through Sharon via
Mossad. The "evidence" so-called, thus, is no counterweight to this
reconstruction of the crime. The "evidence" comes exclusively from the
prime "frame-up" suspect.
Has Mossad done this kind of thing before? Remember the USS Liberty, an
American ship with flag flying, deliberately attacked and sunk (in
multiple attack waves) with efforts to kill every sailor aboard --
either to destroy information that the ship may have intercepted or to
frame Arab states to gain the support of American public opinion. (There
are other cases involving the blowing up of a disco dance nightclub,
again to frame targeted enemies -- a case actually brought to light by
the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.)
The cover-up apparently has unlimited resources. Two Mossad men caught
red handed days after the WTC crash bombings, were carrying explosive
charges and detonation controls in the government chambers of the
Mexican legislature? Apparently big bribes have been offered, because these men
have been set free.
One surmises that appeals are made to the bogey man of a "destabilizing
international crisis" if the truth were to get out. This is ancient
cloak of deviant ruling elites.
How many readers -- even if they strongly suspect that this
reconstruction fits the facts -- would not deny the conclusion anyway
because of fear of what this fact would do to Israel's reputation and
thus to her security and survival?
Yet this view may be wrong. If Israeli's on the "good side" were to
arrest Sharon and chase down the renegades of the Mossad "dark side" and
bring them to justice -- tensions in the Mideast would dissolve, and
good-faith restored -- good faith that will never return to the world as
long as the greatest terror frame-up in history is not corrected by
justice and the truth.
Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly raises the
likelihood that Ariel Sharon was also the man who gave the order for the
murder of Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's greatest peacemaker (if that title
does not go to Begin for his treaty with Sadat.)
Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering
"take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at last be discredited and
that the humanitarian way of Rabin could again be given another chance
-- with the Palestinians gaining restored faith in Israel to be fair and
just after seeing Sharon removed and brought to justice.
I know that at this point you are poised to throw the usual tomatoes and
call me a "loon" and a "Nazi" -- but I know that those who call me those
names are themselves fearful that this analysis may be right.. (And I
forgive you in advance for having to throw those tomatoes out of loyalty
and not knowing what else to do in your uncertainty.)
It is a rotten world all around -- but my advice is to seek the truth
wherever it leads and then to enforce justice -- justice against the
real authors of the Sept 11 terror, whoever they may be -- to go after
Sharon just as strenuously as you were recently ready to hunt down bin
Laden.
And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning of its
topmost shelves of power and influence -- a job that we have been
putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will benefit from
that job!)
(And I should make this clearer: The media are not silent because they
are complicit in the terror -- they are silent because they are "yes
men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they are not about to
jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see others in their positions
doing so. This is consistent with today's "Dilbert" world of
Establishment-monopolized organizations. Only an earth shaking event,
like the exposing of the Establishment's role in the WTC terror, will
shake down this system.)
Now, let's discuss this intelligently.
"Dick Eastman"
eastman@wolfenet.com
Yakima, Washington
The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, credit card issues, credit repair problems and
foreclosure. What can be
done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that we can control
government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel
Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years
ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
 |
|
