CHAPTER TWELVE
The bottom line is this: AIDS is a political disease. Its impact on America is, therefore, being
downplayed. Why? Because the perpetrators and the infected share, ironically, a common goal: the less
public alarm, the better. The Olympians want the disease spread without interference from a frightened
public. People with AIDS understandably want the protection of their civil rights. That could be
threatened by a frightened public.
Those who do not want the American public to know the full menace of AIDS deliberately turned the
homosexual network into a powerful lobbying force. The gay community has become the unwitting ally
of their Olympian enemies. While the Olympians falsely blame gays as the cause of the epidemic, they
are still the only ones powerful enough to protect gay civil rights. Their relationship resembles the
Stockholm Syndrome, in which the hostages come to feel a strange kinship with their terrorist captors.
The result is a massive propaganda apparatus—with unlimited financing and an efficiently organized gay
network—ranged against the American people. The gay network is strong in most countries. As far back
as 1978, the International Gay Association (IGA) was set up—in both senses—in England, with
secretariat offices in Dublin and a Gay Financial Center in Amsterdam, which receives large contributions
from religious groups, Hollywood stars, and others of liberal bent.
But it is not the welfare of gay men that the IGA has in mind; it is their utter destruction. The IGA has
succeeded in getting a number of countries, notably England, France and the United States, to pass laws
under the heading of "hate laws" which forbid, on pain of severe penalties, any interference with the "rights" of homosexuals not only to "exist," but to carry on their "lifestyle."
The International Gay Association was responsible for disrupting the International Conference on AIDS
in Montreal, Canada. Act-Up members shouted and held up proceedings, while a leader took over the
microphone, and in response to chants of "read the demands, read the Manifesto," began to spell out its
self-styled International Code of Rights. Here is what the IGA demanded
:
1. Anonymous Testing.
2. Confidential HIV Testing.
This was first legislated in California, where the law is now used to threaten doctors with
fines of $10,000 and prison if, under any circumstances, they release information on a
patient's HIV antibody status.
3. Pre-test Counseling Program.
This is designed to discourage doctors from taking the trouble to test patients.
4. No Mandatory Testing.
In preventing mandatory testing, the gay lobby is actually helping the spread of the disease.
5. No Quarantine Under Any Circumstances.
This harms everybody, including gays, because it allows persons with AIDS to knowingly
continue spreading the disease. Stories abound of people who have done just that. The most
famous case was the Canadian airline male flight attendant—'Patient Zero," as he came to
be called—who promiscuously infected homosexuals in Europe, the U.S. and Latin
America, and who, when asked to stop, simply refused. He continued this practice until his
appearance prohibited it. There were no legal sanctions to stop him from his monstrous
form of mass murder.
6. A Policy of: No Casual Spread of Infection.
The Gay Lobby demanded that government agencies officially adopt such a statement to
allay the fears of the public. In other words, it would become the duty of the government
and the medical profession to keep the public persuaded that it is impossible to get AIDS
from kissing—or any other contact less intimate than sex without condoms.
7. No discrimination (including in jobs or housing).
International education programs in comprehensive sex information supportive of all sexual
orientations, describing "safe sex" and needle use practices and other means of preventing
HIV transmissions.
The Gay Media Task Force is a committee that reviews television programs about AIDS. This group can
make life uncomfortable for any network that doesn't toe the line, as NBC found out in December, 1988,
when they screened "Midnight Caller." Rioting broke out in San Francisco, and NBC promised never to
ignore the committee again.
The Gay Task Force virtually controlled the dissemination of information about California's Proposition
102, which would have required physicians in the state to report to health authorities all positive HIV
tests. It also called for mandatory tracing of sexual partners or intravenous drug-using partners of those
who tested positive. The Proposition was voted down with the help of Congressman Henry Waxman and
Willie Brown, speaker of the House in the California State Assembly, and the Hollywood crowd.
President Reagan fared no better than NBC. In 1987 the President circulated an urgent recommendation to
every Republican governor that they do all that they could to stop the AIDS epidemic. Reagan wanted
mandatory AIDS testing. The gay lobby leadership swung into action, and the Surgeon General of the
United States, Dr. Everett Koop, personally went to those states with Republican governors and lobbied
hard among local and state authorities, urging that the President's appeal be ignored. He persuaded them
that mandatory AIDS testing was not necessary to control the epidemic.
When an honest history of the AIDS plague is written, it will be recorded that a small number of people
and groups—with billions of dollars at their disposal—were able to persuade the public that mandatory
AIDS testing was of no value—and perhaps harmful. Among those listed will be Dr. Koop, the Gay
Lobby, the ACLU, the media, the National Organization of Women and Dr. David Axelrod.
Dr. Axelrod is typical of the gay lobby's allies in hindering any progress toward stopping the AIDS
epidemic through mandatory testing. With no special qualifications, he was given the position of New
York State Health Commissioner—which he owed to his supporters in the Council on Foreign Relations,
an Olympian group.
One of his first actions in his new job was to forbid doctors from performing routine HIV tests in their
offices. Axelrod gave no reason for his dictatorial edict, which stated that "henceforth all HIV testing
shall be done only in special laboratories, those with blood and tissue banks, state, county and or city
laboratories located in hospitals affiliated with medical schools, the American Red Cross or New York
blood programs, or research laboratories doing public health work under contract."
There was no sound reason to prevent doctors from testing for the AIDS virus in their offices, but Axelrod
forced them to send their patients elsewhere at the cost of time, trouble and expense. Why? Intelligence
reports say that the gay lobby, itself influenced by the Council on Foreign Relations, was determined to
slow down or stop HIV-testing.
Dr. Axelrod's other contribution to the epidemic was his anonymous testing program. At least threehundred
thousand samples were to be collected from hospitals all across New York State, but no names
were to be associated with the samples. If a sample was positive, the infected individual could go right on
infecting others.
How did Axelrod justify his policy? "We need more accurate information about the numbers and
distributions of individuals already infected with the virus," he said, "to plan the necessary medical
services and to do extensive anonymous testing, to gather the statistics, but not to stop the epidemic." That
was a preposterous statement from a doctor sworn to save lives. Of what value was anonymous testing?
None.
But Axelrod was not alone. The medical profession was equally committed to preventing mandatory
testing. The New England Journal of Medicine and The Journal of the American Medical Association
both ran a concerted drive against it. Both of these prestigious medical journals made the false claims that
widespread testing would give too many false-positive results, causing public panic. The American
Medical Association, without the slightest proof to its claims, argued that the false-positive results would "alarm" the public.
Dr. Axelrod and the gay lobby—and the medical journals—simply swept under the carpet the impressive
work of the U.S. Army in eliminating false-positive HIV tests. In June, 1986, the results of the Army's
mandatory testing were released to the Second World Congress on AIDS. The false-positive results were
so low as to be statistically irrelevant.
Colonel Donald F. Burke was the officer in charge of administering the HIV-tests to recruits. His
meticulous record keeping has never been questioned, nor the credibility of his report that there was only
one false positive test per 130,000 recruits. Even more striking was Colonel Burke's report that by 1983,
the Army had developed techniques which cut the rate of false-positive tests to one in a million.
Why have the gay lobby and the Olympians gone to such lengths to prevent mandatory testing? Because
they want the public kept in ignorance about how widespread AIDS has become. Mandatory testing
would reveal to the public that AIDS is much more widespread than now believed. The Olympians do not
want AIDS slowed down by informed public demands for proper epidemic controls.
There is no merit to the argument that a law requiring mandatory AIDS testing would lead to the violation
of gay civil rights—or that gays would become the target of an incensed population. The U.S. Army has
shown that testing for HIV can be made simple, non-intrusive and highly accurate. The idea that a fatal
disease must not be identified in a carrier because it might lead to a deprivation of his civil rights is
simply bizarre.
Yet the gay lobby persists in its destructive course. The International Gay Alliance has grown bold
enough to ask for "observer status" at the United Nations. A number of U. N. delegates, including the
American delegation, are acting as "ex-officio" representatives for the International Gay Association, thus
making AIDS even more of a political issue—rather than a fundamental life-and-death matter of epidemic
control and public health.
The gay leadership wrongly—a fatal mistake—believes it has the sympathy and protection of
government. Undoubtedly that is true of many compassionate people who work in government and are as
unwitting of the real cause of AIDS as anyone else. But the truth about some of those powerful enough to
manipulate government at the highest levels—The Olympians—is exactly the opposite.
To the gays, I say this with my deepest conviction, after years of researching the AIDS epidemic:
government is your enemy, not your friend. Relatively useless laws passed to protect gay civil rights are
nothing but a red herring to draw attention away from the real problem. The real solutions to the AIDS
epidemic—for everyone—do not lie in the current policies. Much of the leadership of the gay community
does not appear to have grasped this nasty truth. Gays are being duped by a government that has targeted
them for death.
To those who would ask: "Is that even possible?" I would say: Look very closely at what the top
virologists and microbiologists in the world were secretly discussing with each other at the Banbury
Conference in the spring of 1985.
Chapters 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Appendices - Footnotes
All of the events and characters depicted in this book
are non-fictional
Copyright © 1994 by Dr. Gary L. Glum
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American
Copyright conventions. Published in the United States by
Silent Walker Publishing, Los Angeles.
ISBN 0-9620364-1-2
Manufactured in the United States of America
Typography and binding design by Silent Walker Publishing
First Edition |
|
SILENT WALKER
PUBLISHING
LOS ANGELES |
Disclaimer:
The information on this website is presented for educational purposes
only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment and
advice of a qualified licensed professional.
Throughout this
website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or functions
of nutritional products. These statements have not been evaluated by the
Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products are not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
Yadda-yadda
This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that
we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer,
told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me
to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture?
Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does
this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead
of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really
are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. (attributed to Voltaire), but certainly embodies what the 1st amendment of the constitution refers to as the freedom of speech
Bill of Rights
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Queen
Victoria
