Toxic Sound |
 |
|
The
Soundprints Of Science
By Elizabeth F. van Mantgem Conservation Biologist, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Assessing the Natural Soundscape through Biophony Faster than the extinction of species, natural sounds are disappearing from our last remaining wild areas. A person who's most concerned about the loss is the well-known artist and researcher, Dr. Bernie Krause (best known as front man for the 1960's folk group, The Weavers, right after Pete Seeger). Because he's been recording natural sounds for the better part of his 63 years, he's become acutely tuned into the deterioration of biophony, or natural orchestras, throughout the world. Now he's bringing his expertise to the National Park System (NPS), and assisting with a mandated project for preserving the natural sounds, or soundscapes, of some of your favorite natural areas, starting with Sequoia National Park.
In direct violation of the 1916 NPS Organic Act, many parks are probably losing biodiversity and ecosystem integrity through exposure to incessant, manmade sounds. An example of these noise-troubled places is the Blue Ridge Parkway of Virginia, where you'll hear automobile noise in constant accompaniment to birds and other wildlife. Elliott Key of Florida's Biscayne National Park is another noise pollution victim, where motorboats, air conditioners, and power generators create a white noise that drowns the sounds of the ocean. In parks and natural areas everywhere, the human sounds of airplanes, jet skis, power boats, traffic, racetracks, and snowmobiles have invaded otherwise pristine habitats and altered animal behavior with their echoing engine noises. In response, the NPS issued Director's Order No. 47, the general instructions for Soundscape Preservation and Noise Management within our country's National Parks. A statistic cited within the order as justification for its creation was the discovery that, after a park-wide survey, 91% of visitors said they came to parks, "to enjoy the natural soundscape." That's significantly close to the 93% who come to view the scenery. This simple statistic illustrates that in letting the soundscape deteriorate, the NPS would fail to fulfill its central mission, to preserve all natural and cultural resources for the future and future generations. The only problem in preserving or even restoring the natural soundscape is in deciding which sounds are natural. When asked whether manmade sounds can ever be part of the natural soundscape, Dr. Krause responded, "Of course. But we must learn the extent to which they have, or don't have, an impact on the biophony." Subsequently, Order #47 also requires parks to first assess baseline acoustic conditions, and then to pick out the good and the bad sounds, one by one. Management will then deal appropriately with the bad sounds, perhaps by collaborating with noisy neighbors (like military bases and auto race tracks) or by limiting park use. The Project: Aesthetically and Statistically Pleasing The order holds National Parks responsible for assessing baseline acoustic conditions, but there's no standard for doing this. Creating a standard, or sound index and methodology, is why Dr. Krause has been recording sounds in Sequoia National Park through 2001 and 2002.
Even with the unforeseen jet noise, Dr. Krause reports that recording was overwhelmingly successful, "We collected excellent data, useful beyond the scope of our original expectations. But it's hardly a dent in the surface of what we need to collect and review. Furthermore, new analysis techniques subsequently developed by my colleague, Dr. Stuart Gage from the Michigan State University Envirosonics Lab, will reveal even more important detail when it is finally implemented and used to analyze our data. The first 70 page draft of the analysis has been completed and was submitted for a first run peer review. As soon as we get a response as to what we've offered, we'll be conforming it into a final document." The pilot project's deliverables will be a representative soundprint database for each of a variety of relatively pristine habitats in Sequoia National Park, plus a complete methodology to use in parks all over the country. Expert ornithologists, entomologists, and other biologists are assisting in the identification soundprint sample sounds. The unadulterated, natural sounds of Sequoia National Park will then be used to calibrate the sound and health of other parks around the country. According to Dr. Krause, "we hope to introduce new automated monitoring technologies and techniques that would allow data collection over a wide range of parks and at many sites within each one. We hope the results will be useful over a wide range of applications. Among them, the density of vocal creature populations, their distribution within a biome, the health status of the habitat, and the diversity of vocal creatures. Once a biophonic base line is established, we hope to use variations as a barometer for changes in status and to find new ways to evaluate habitat dynamics."
So the locations were chosen for their biological uniqueness and their convenience. Each habitat was monitored once for each season of the year and recorded. The result is four, one-hour recordings segmented into 1-minute segments, the subsamples used for intra-temporal comparison. The whole point is to get some good, representative samples of biophony (nature orchestras unique to specific habitats) with all its variability in each soundscape. This means that frogs, birds, insects, wind, and even running water was recorded as part of this beautiful music. Whatever was out there, naturally making noise became a part of the biophonic data. When the orchestras were transcribed onto paper, they became quantifiable soundprints, precisely measured sound samples. Several soundprint samples were then used to represent a habitat in time and space, an aesthetically pleasing as well as a statistically quantifiable methodology. The results should be both interesting and useful, as well as cutting-edge. Listen to to a sample recording of a natureal soundscape: dawn.mp3 (472K) ©2001 Wild Sanctuary, Inc. All rights reserved. Dr. Bernie Krause & His Big Ideas
Bernie Krause often uses this Mono Lake observation as proof that species suffer from anthropogenic noise. While there, he noticed a population of Western spadefoot toads chorusing in classic, selfish-herd style (in synchrony, a communication strategy that avoids predation). "When a jet plane flew over, it disturbed the cycle of vocalization". The plane's noise caused most of the toads to be quiet, but several of the toads vocalized individually, inadvertently making themselves targets for predators like coyotes and owls. Apparently, quite a few of the toads were consumed.A Whale of a Noise Bernie Krause is not the only researcher to find intrusive human noises severely altering animal behaviors. For example, the noise from whale watching boats in British Columbia causes hearing loss and behavioral avoidance in killer whales (Orcinus orca). The noise from boats also interferes with the whales' communications (Erbe 2002). Another researcher found that aircraft noise significantly alters beluga (Delpinaperus leucas) and bowhead whale (Blaena mysticetus) behavior. Depending on the closeness of helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft, whales would breach, swim vigorously, surface, dive or turn, or just change their behavior (Patenaude et al. 2002). By deliberately placing noise makers in the Johnstone Strait and the Broghton Archipelago, Morton and Symonds (2002) accomplished two goals. They were able to, "deter predation on fish pens by harbour seals (Phoca vitulina Linnaeus), and also conclusively determine that killer whales were leaving the area in response to the noise. This is an important study because it's difficult to separate noise from other stimuli when assessing the affects on wildlife".Another convincing study showed that the noise from an annual music festival in Northern England significantly impacted a bat population's evening emergence time. As a result of the noise, an entire colony of Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii) waited 47 minutes longer than normal to begin their nightly foraging. The result was that researchers recommended that the festival be moved to a different time of year (Shirle, et al. 2001). Humans are also significantly affected by unwanted noise. Horrible noise actually alters the human cardiovascular system, even after the exposure to loud noise has ended (Rocco et al. 1999). Of course, the degree to which individuals are affected depends on the kind of noise (nature, intensity, predictability, control), the task at hand (mental, sensory-motor, vigilance), and the personality of the subject (Razaque 1999). Another researcher found that loud noise also affects the human endocrine system, causing significant fluctuations in our hormones, like cortisol (decrease), DHEA-S (increase, dehydroepiandroserone-sulphate), prolactin (decrease), and growth hormone (decrease). This means that loud noise can induce hormonally caused, "psychological and behavioral effects" (Romei et al. 2000). So obviously, this primary research supports your long-held suspicion that you feel happier with good music and the sound of friendly laughter. In contrast, the research proves that loud, unwanted, unpredictable noise can set you on edge, gritting your teeth in resistance. Human medical research has found that the quality of a person's daily dosage of sound significantly affects the human physiology. Your blood pressure becomes erratic and your endocrine system is shoved off-balance. Your intelligence, dexterity, and ability to concentrate may also be significantly impaired. Loud noises even diminishes a person's learning ability, as well as minimizes the length and quality of human sleeping patterns. The problem is that these effects aren't restricted to us in our urban landscapes; it's also happening in remote areas, affecting our animals and the habitats where they are, like us, attempting to thrive. Citations & Sources: Read the SNN Book review of Wild Soundscapes, Discovering the Voice of the Natural World; A Book and CD Recording by Bernie Krause, Wilderness Press 2002 Erbe, C. 2002. Underwater noise of whale watching boats and potential effects on killer whales (Orcinus orca), based on an acoustic impact model. Marine Mammal Science 18 (2): 394-418. Krause, Bernie, personal communication http://www.wildsanctuary.com Krause, B., and Stuart H. Gage. 2001. Testing biophony as an indicator of habitat fitness in Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks. Natural Soundscape Vital Signs Pilot Program, Version 2 Draft. 4pp. Lavendel, Brian. Preserving the Peace and Quiet. National Parks July/August 2002. Pp. 34-37 Morton, A. B. and H. K. Symonds. 2002. Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada. ICES Journal of Marin Science 59(1);71-80. Patenaude, N. J. W. J. Richardson, M.A. Smultea, W.R. Koski, G.W.Miller, B.Wursig, C.R.Greene. 2002. Aircraft sound and disturbance to bowhead and beluga whales during spring migration I the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Marin Mammal Science 18(2):309-335. Razaque, S. 1999. Noise pollution and juman performance - an analytical study. Journal of Human Ecology 10(3):223-226. Rocco, S., G. Rausa, M. Riolfatti, and M. Bolzan. 1999. Noise: physiological effects and the necessity of prevention. Igiene Moderna Ottobre 112(4):1515-1529. Shirley, M.D.F., V.L.Armitage, T.L.Barden, M.Goufh, P.W.W. Lurz, D.E. Oatway, A.B.South, and S. P. Rushton. Assessing the impact of a music festival on the emerence behaviour of a breeding colony of Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii). Journal of Zoology 254(3):367-373. Tomei, F. M.G.Ruffino, E.Tomao, T.P.Baccolo, M.V.Rosati, and F. Strollo. 2000. Acute experimental exposure to noise and hormonal modifications. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A. Toxic-Hazardous Substance and Environmental Engineering 35(4):537-555. FACT: Pharmaceuticals Destroy Aquatic Life Thyroid Toxin Taints Water
Supplies for Millions in Calif. & Nationwide India: Mobile towers threatening honey bees in Kerala Thiruvananthapuram, Aug 31 (PTI) Mobile towers are posing a threat to honey bees in Kerala withe electromagnetic radiation from mobile towers and cell phones having the potential to kill worker bees that go out to collect nectar from flowers, says a study.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
